UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

NOTICE OF THE 20162017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO ALL SUNPOWER STOCKHOLDERS:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of SunPower Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SunPower”), will be held on:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice of the Annual Meeting. On or about March 17, 20162017 we began mailing to stockholders either a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or this notice of the Annual Meeting, the proxy statement and the form of proxy.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 29, 201628, 2017 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. Any registered stockholder in attendance at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote may do so during the meeting even if such stockholder returned a proxy.

San Jose, California		FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
March 17, 2017
San Jose, California March 17, 2016
		FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSKenneth Mahaffey   Lisa Bodensteiner Corporate Secretary

IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY, OR YOU MAY VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR VIA THE INTERNET BY FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIONS ON THE PROXY CARD. ANY ONE OF THESE METHODS WILL ENSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. NO POSTAGE NEED BE AFFIXED TO THE COMPANY-PROVIDED PROXY CARD ENVELOPE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR
2016

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUNPOWER CORPORATION

77 Rio Robles

San Jose, California 95134

PROXY STATEMENT FOR
2016

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

General

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SunPower Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is furnishing this proxy statement and proxy card to you in connection with its solicitation of proxies to be used at SunPower Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 201627, 2017 at 10:12:00 a.m.p.m. Pacific Time (the “Meeting Date”), or at any adjournment(s), continuation(s) or postponement(s) of the meeting (the “Annual Meeting”).

This year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, conducted via a live webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the meeting by visitingwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPWR2016SPWR2017. Have your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card in hand when you access the website and then follow the instructions. To participate in the meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card.

Online check-in will begin at 9:11:30 a.m. Pacific Time on the Meeting Date, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures. We will have technicians ready to assist you should you have any technical difficulties accessing the virtual meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call 1-855-449-0991.

We use a number of abbreviations in this proxy statement. We refer to SunPower Corporation as “SunPower,” “the Company,” or “we,” “us” or “our.” The term “proxy solicitation materials” includes this proxy statement, the notice of the Annual Meeting, and the proxy card. References to “fiscal 2016” mean our 2016 fiscal year, which began on January 4, 2016 and ended on January 1, 2017, while references to “fiscal 2015” mean our 2015 fiscal year, which began on December 29, 2014 and ended on January 3, 2016, while references to “fiscal 2014” mean our 2014 fiscal year, which began on December 30, 2013 and ended on December 28, 2014.2015.

Our principal executive offices are located at 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134, and our telephone number is (408) 240-5500.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

We have elected to comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) “Notice and Access” rules, which allow us to make our proxy solicitation materials available to our stockholders over the Internet. Under these rules, on or about March 17, 2016,2017, we started mailing to certain of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”). The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how our stockholders can both access the proxy solicitation materials and our 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 20161, 2017 (the “2015“2016 Annual Report”) online and vote online. By sending the Notice of Internet Availability instead of paper copies of the proxy materials, we expect to lower the costs and reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

Our proxy solicitation materials and our 20152016 Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

Stockholders receiving the Notice of Internet Availability may request a paper or electronic copy of our proxy solicitation materials by following the instructions set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability. Stockholders who did not receive the Notice of Internet Availability will continue to receive a paper or electronic copy of our proxy solicitation materials, which were first mailed to stockholders and made public on or about March 17, 2016.2017.

Delivery of Voting Materials

If you would like to further reduce our environmental impact and costs in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided for voting viawww.proxyvote.com and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

To reduce the environmental waste and expense of delivering duplicate materials to our stockholders, we are taking advantage of householding rules that permit us to deliver only one set of proxy solicitation materials and our 20152016 Annual Report, or one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability, to stockholders who share the same address, unless otherwise requested. Each stockholder retains a separate right to vote on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting.

If you share an address with another stockholder and have received only one set of materials, you may write or call us to request a separate copy of these materials at no cost to you. For future annual meetings, you may request separate materials or request that we only send one set of materials to you if you are receiving multiple copies by writing to us at SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or calling us at (408) 240-5500.

A copy of our 20152016 Annual Report has been furnished with this proxy statement to each stockholder. A stockholder may also request a copy of our 20152016 Annual Report by writing to our Corporate Secretary at 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134. Upon receipt of such request, we will provide a copy of our 20152016 Annual Report without charge, including the financial statements required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 13a-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) for our fiscal year 2015.2016. Our 20152016 Annual Report is also available on our website athttp://investors.sunpower.com/sec.cfm.

Record Date and Shares Outstanding

Stockholders who owned shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at the close of business on February 29, 2016,28, 2017, which we refer to as the Record Date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, we had 136,780,515138,699,919 shares of common stock outstanding. For more information about beneficial ownership of our issued and outstanding common stock, please see “Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners.”

Board Recommendations

Our Board recommends that you vote:

Voting

Each holder of shares of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held as of the Record Date. Cumulating votes is not permitted under our By-laws.

Many of our stockholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee, rather than directly in his or her own name. As summarized below, there are distinctions between shares held of record and those beneficially owned.

Stockholder of Record.If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company N.A., you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record and these proxy solicitation materials are being furnished to you directly by us.

Beneficial Owner.If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account, or by a bank or other nominee (also known as shares registered in “street name”), you are considered the beneficial owner of such shares held in street name, and these proxy solicitation materials are being furnished to you by your broker, bank or other nominee, who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, or to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting.

How to Vote.If you hold shares directly as a stockholder of record, you can vote in one of the following four ways:

(1)Vote via the Internet before the Meeting Date. Go towww.proxyvote.com to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2016.26, 2017. Have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in hand when you access the website and then follow the instructions.

(2)Vote by Telephone at 1-800-690-6903 before the Meeting Date. Use a touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2016.26, 2017. Have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. This number is toll free in the United States and Canada.

(3)Vote by Mail before the Meeting Date. Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paidpostage- paid envelope we have provided, or return the proxy card to SunPower Corporation, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

(4)Vote via the Internet during the Annual Meeting. You may attend the Annual Meeting on April 28, 201627, 2017 at 10:12:00 a.m.p.m. Pacific Time via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SPWR2016SPWR2017 and vote during the Annual Meeting. Have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in hand when you access the website and then follow the instructions.

If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may submit your voting instructions in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank or other nominee by following the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or you may vote your shares during the Annual Meeting.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described in options (1), (2), and (3) above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Quorum.A quorum, which is the holders of at least a majority of shares of our stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the Record Date, is required to be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and to conduct business. Your shares will be counted as being present at the Annual Meeting if you attend the Annual Meeting (and are the stockholder of record for your shares), if you vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet, or if you submit a properly executed proxy card. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Votes against a particular proposal will also be counted both to determine the presence or absence of a quorum and to determine whether the requisite number of voting shares has been obtained.

Explanation of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions.A “broker non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. The rules of The New York Stock Exchange (which also apply to companies listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market) prohibit brokers from voting in their discretion on any non-routine proposals without instructions from the beneficial owners. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote on a non-routine proposal, your broker will not vote for you. Abstentions are deemed to be entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether stockholder approval of that matter has been obtained, and they would be included in the tabulation of voting results as votes against the proposal.

Votes Required/Treatment of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions.

Proposal One—Re-election of Class IIIII Directors.Election. Election of a director requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of votes represented by the shares in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. The three persons receiving the greatest number of votes at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as Class IIIII directors. Neither “broker non-votes” nor abstentions will affect the outcome of the voting on Proposal One.

Proposal Two—Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation. The non-binding advisory vote on named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our stock having voting power and in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. “Broker non-votes” have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against Proposal Two.

Proposal Three—Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation. The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by holders of our stock having voting power and in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation that has been recommended by our stockholders. Neither “broker non-votes” nor abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for this proposal.

Proposal Four—Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 20162017. Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our stock having voting power and in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. “Broker non-votes” have no effect and will not be counted towards this proposal. We do not expect “broker non-votes” since brokers have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against Proposal Three.Four.

How Your Proxy Will Be Voted

If you complete and submit your proxy card or vote via the Internet or by telephone, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you submit your proxy card by mail, but do not fill out the voting instructions on the proxy card, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted in favor of each of the three proposals.Proposals One, Two and Four and for Proposal Three in favor of holding future stockholder advisory votes annually on named executive officer compensation. In addition, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote the shares they represent as directed by the Board. We have not received notice of any other matters that may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting.

Revoking Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy at any time before the Meeting Date by: (1) submitting a later-dated vote by telephone, by mail, or via the Internet before or at the Annual Meeting; or (2) delivering instructions to us at 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134 to the attention of our Corporate Secretary. Any notice of revocation sent to us must include the stockholder’s name and must be actually received by us before the Annual Meeting to be effective. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting after having executed and delivered a valid proxy card or vote via the Internet or by telephone will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of your proxy. If you are the stockholder of record or if your shares are held in “street name,” you may revoke your proxy by voting electronically at the Annual Meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

We will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding or furnishing proxy solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited personally or by telephone, telegram or facsimile by certain of our directors, officers, and regular employees, without additional compensation.

Voting Results

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we intend to file with the SEC within four business days after the Meeting Date.

Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain of the statements contained in this proxy statement are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that do not represent historical facts and the assumptions underlying such statements. We use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to, operating results, business strategies, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, expectations and intentions, actions to be taken by us and other statements that are not historical facts. These forward-lookingforward- looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this proxy statement and our current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control. All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our 20152016 Annual Report, which accompanies this proxy statement. There may be other factors of which we are not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the forward-looking statements and may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date, and we are under no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any responsibility to, update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY, OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR VIA THE INTERNET BY FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIONS ON THE PROXY CARD. STOCKHOLDERS WHO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING MAY REVOKE A PRIOR PROXY VOTE AND VOTE THEIR SHARES AS SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

PROPOSAL ONE

RE-ELECTION OF CLASS IIIII DIRECTORS

Our Board is currently composed of nine directors and divided into three classes, in accordance with Article IV, Section B of our Certificate of Incorporation. Only the terms of the three directors serving as Class IIIII directors are scheduled to expire in 2016.2017. The terms of other directors expire in subsequent years.

On April 28, 2011, we and Total Energies Nouvelles Activités USA, SAS, formerly known as Total Gas & Power USA, SAS (“Total”), a subsidiary of Total S.A. (“Total S.A.”), entered into a Tender Offer Agreement (the “Tender Offer Agreement”). Pursuant to the Tender Offer Agreement, on June 21, 2011, Total purchased in a cash tender offer approximately 60% of the outstanding shares of our former Class A common stock and 60% of the outstanding shares of our former Class B common stock (the “Tender Offer”). In connection with the Tender Offer, we and Total entered into an Affiliation Agreement that governs the relationship between Total and us following the close of the Tender Offer (the “Affiliation Agreement”). In accordance with the terms of the Affiliation Agreement, our Board has nine members, composed of our Chief Executive Officer, three non-Total-designated members of the Board, and five directors designated by Total. If the ownership of our voting power by Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., declines below certain thresholds, the number of members of the Board that Total is entitled to designate will be reduced as set forth in the Affiliation Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions—Agreements with Total Energies Nouvelles ActivitéActivités USA, SASand Total S.A.—Affiliation Agreement.”

The Board has considered and approved the nomination of Bernard Clément, Denis Giorno,Helle Kristoffersen, Thomas McDaniel and Catherine Lesjak,Thomas Werner, our current Class IIIII directors, for re-election as directors at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Clement and Giorno areMs. Kristoffersen is a Total-designated directors. Ms. Lesjakdirector. Mr. McDaniel is an independent director. Mr. Werner is our President, CEO and Chairman of the Board. Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if re-elected. Unless otherwise directed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the three nominees named below. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who is designated by the present Board to fill the vacancy. We do not expect that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director. The Class IIIII directors elected will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 20192020 or until their successors are elected.

The Class I group of directors consists of Arnaud Chaperon, Daniel Lauré, Laurent Wolffsheim and Pat Wood III, who will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2018 or until their successors are elected. Messrs. ChaperonLauré and LauréWolffsheim are Total-designated directors. Mr. Wood is an independent director. The Class IIIII group of directors consists of Thomas McDaniel, Humbert de Wendel,Cathie Lesjak, Ladislas Paszkiewicz and Thomas Werner,Julien Pouget, who will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 20172019 or until their successors are elected. Mr. de Wendel is a Total-designated director. Mr. Werner is our President, CEO and Chairman of the Board. Mr. McDanielMs. Lesjak is an independent director. Messrs. Paszkiewicz and Pouget are Total-designated directors.

Additional information as of March 17, 2015, about the Class IIIII director nominees for re-election and the Class I and Class IIIII directors is set forth below.

Class IIIII Directors Nominated for Re-Election at the Annual Meeting

Mr. Bernard ClémentMs. Helle Kristoffersen has served as the Senior Vice President, BusinessStrategy and Corporate Affairs, Gas, Renewables & Operations, of the New Energies division ofPower segment for Total S.A. since July 1, 2012. Before that appointment, heSeptember 2016. From January 2012 to August 2016, she was Senior Vice President, of Gas Assets, Technology, and ResearchStrategy & Development forBusiness Intelligence at the Gas & Power divisiongroup level of Total S.A. since January 1, 2010. From 2003 through 2009, Mr. ClémentPrior to that, she served as Deputy Vice President of the Exploration & Production divisionsame department since January 2011. In 1994, she joined Alcatel, where she spent 16 years and served in particular as Vice President Corporate Strategy of Total S.A. relativeAlcatel and subsequently Alcatel-Lucent. She currently serves as a director of Orange and PSA Group (Peugeot). Ms. Kristoffersen served as a director of Valeo from 2007 to its interests2013. Ms. Kristoffersen is a graduate of the Ecole Normale Supérieure and the Paris Graduate School of Economics, Statistics and Finance (ENSAE). Ms. Kristoffersen also holds a master’s degree in econometrics from Université Paris 1.

Ms. Kristoffersen brings significant international strategic and business development experience to the Board. Her extensive experience in the Middle East. Beforeenergy and technology industries, including her service on the boards of directors of several international, publicly listed companies, gives her a valuable perspective on our role in the global marketplace. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that he held other positions within the Total group, where heBoard has been employed since 1983. Mr. Clément has engineering degrees from Ecole Nationale Supérieure du Pétrole et des Moteurs, where he focusedconcluded that Ms. Kristoffersen should serve as a director on geophysics, and from École Polytechnique.our Board.

Mr. ClémentThomas R. McDaniel was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Edison International, a generator and distributor of electric power and investor in infrastructure and energy assets, before retiring in July 2008 after 37 years of service. Before January 2005, Mr. McDaniel was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Edison Mission Energy, a power generation business specializing in the development, acquisition, construction, management and operation of power production facilities. Mr. McDaniel was also Chief Executive Officer and a director of Edison Capital, a provider of capital and financial services supporting the growth of energy and infrastructure projects, products and services, both domestically and internationally. Mr. McDaniel has served on our Board since February 2009. He is Chairman of the Board of Tendril, a smart-grid, software-as-a-service company. Mr. McDaniel is chairman of the board of SemGroup, L.P., a midstream energy services company, and is also on the advisory board of Cypress Envirosystems, which develops and markets energy efficiency products. He also serves on the Advisory Board of On Ramp Wireless, a communications company serving electrical, gas and water utilities. Mr. McDaniel formerly served on the board of directors of the Senior Care Action Network (SCAN) from 2000-2013. Through the McDaniel Family Foundation, he is also actively involved in a variety of charitable activities such as the Boys and Girls Club of Huntington Beach, Heifer International and the Free Wheelchair Mission.

Mr. McDaniel brings significant international operational and development experience to the Board. HisMr. McDaniel’s extensive experience managing international energy projectsgrowing and assets,operating global electric power businesses is directly aligned with our efforts to further develop the utility and power plant portions of our business. In addition, Mr. McDaniel’s prior experience as wella Chief Financial Officer qualifies him as managing technology development, allows hima financial expert, which is relevant to provide valuable insight into our strategic development and our ability to meet our manufacturing goals.his duties as an audit committee member. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. ClémentMcDaniel should serve as a director on our Board.Board, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Finance Committee.

Mr. Denis GiornoThomas H. Werner has served as our President and CEOChief Executive Officer since May 2010, as a member of Total New Energies USAour Board since January 2013.June 2003, and Chairman of the Board since May 2011. From November 2011 until January 2013,June 2003 to April 2010, Mr. Werner served as our Chief Executive Officer. Before joining SunPower, from 2001 to 2003, he also served asheld the position of Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Light Machines, Inc., an optical solutions subsidiary of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Werner was Vice President and General Manager. From October 2007 until October 2011, he served as the Vice President of New Ventures for the Gas & Power division of Total S.A. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Giorno was Vice President, Business Development,Manager of the Gas & Power division relative to Total’s interests in Asia, South America,Business Connectivity Group of 3Com Corp., a network solutions company. He has also held a number of executive management positions at Oak Industries, Inc. and Africa. Before that, he held other positions withinGeneral Electric Co. Mr. Werner currently serves as a board member of Cree, Inc., Silver Spring Networks, and the Total group, where he has been employed since 1975.Silicon Valley Leadership Group. Mr. Giorno receivedWerner is on the Board of Trustees of Marquette University. Mr. Werner holds a bachelor’s degree in civilindustrial engineering from École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées,the University of Wisconsin–Madison, a master of sciencebachelor’s degree in managerial science andelectrical engineering from StanfordMarquette University and a master’s degree in petroleum engineeringbusiness administration from École Nationale du Pétrole et des Moteurs. Mr. Giorno also completed the Stanford Graduate School of Business’ Executive Education program.George Washington University.

Mr. Giorno’s extensive, worldwide business developmentWerner brings significant leadership, technical, operational and international negotiationfinancial management experience covers a broad spectrum of traditional power projects and renewable energy projects, including experience throughoutto the value chain inBoard. Mr. Werner provides the solar sector. This experience allows him to make significant contributionsBoard with valuable insight into management’s perspective with respect to our strategic outlookoperations. Mr. Werner has demonstrated strong executive leadership skills through nearly 20 years of executive officer service with various companies and international development perspectives.brings the most comprehensive view of our operational history over the past several years. Mr. Werner also brings to the Board leadership experience through his service on the board of directors for three other organizations, which gives him the ability to compare the way in which management and the boards operate within the companies he serves. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. GiornoWerner should serve as a director on our Board.

Ms. Catherine A. Lesjak has served as Executive Vice PresidentBoard and Chief Financial OfficerChairman of HP Inc. (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company) (HP) since January 1, 2007. Ms. Lesjak served as interim Chief Executive Officer of HP from August 2010 through October 2010. As a 29-year veteran at HP, Ms. Lesjak held a broad range of financial leadership roles across HP. Before being named as CFO, Ms. Lesjak served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, responsible for managing HP’s worldwide cash, debt, foreign exchange, capital structure, risk management and benefits plan administration. Earlier in her career at HP, she managed financial operations for Enterprise Marketing and Solutions and the Software Global Business Unit. Before that, she was group controller for HP’s Software Solutions Organization and managed HP’s global channel credit risk as controller and credit manager for the Commercial Customer Organization. Ms. Lesjak has a bachelor’s degree in biology from Stanford University and a master of business degree in finance from the University of California, Berkeley.

Ms. Lesjak’s extensive experience as the chief financial officer of a major corporation, with significant presence in both the business-to-consumer and business-to-business markets, allows her to make significant contributions to our strategic business planning and execution. Her background is also valuable in terms of financial oversight and review of our strategic investments. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Ms. Lesjak should serve as a director on our Board.

Class I Directors with Terms Expiring in 2018

Mr. Arnaud Chaperon currently serves as the Senior Vice President of Prospective Analysis, Institutional Relations and Communications for the New Energies division of Total S.A. Before taking this position with the New Energies division in 2007, Mr. Chaperon was the Managing Director for five years of Total E&P Qatar and country representative of the Total group, which has oil, gas and petrochemical assets and operations in the State of Qatar. Before that, he held other positions within the Total group, where he has been employed since 1980. Mr. Chaperon holds a master’s degree in engineering from École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées.

Mr. Chaperon brings significant international strategic, operational and development experience to the Board. His experience developing renewable energy projects and investments throughout the value chain for the Total group, as well as managing traditional oil and gas operations, gives him a unique perspective on our strategic outlook and worldwide opportunities. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. Chaperon should serve as a director on our Board.

Mr. Daniel Lauré currently serves as President and CEO of Total New Energies USA Inc. Before taking this position in March 2016, Mr. Lauré served as Senior Vice President Industrial Assets, Finance & Information Technology from 2012 through 2015. Before that, he held other positions within Total Gas & Power beginning in 2004, including Vice President,

Strategy, Markets & IT, and Deputy Director, Renewable Energy, Strategy, Human Resources & Communication. Prior to those positions, Mr. Lauré held various other positions within the Total Group, where he has been employed since 1988. Mr. Lauré holds a degree in civil engineering from l’École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées and a law degree from Université Panthéon Assas (Paris II).

Mr. Lauré brings significant international managerial and operational experience to the Board. His extensive experience in the energy industry gives him a valuable perspective on our efforts to manage our business and project development activities. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. Lauré should serve as a director on our Board.

Mr. Laurent Wolffsheim has served as Vice President, Budget & Financial Control for the Total group since February 2014. Before that, he served as Strategic Planning Manager within the Refining & Chemicals division of Total S.A. and Managing Director of Total Polska Sp. z o.o. Prior to those positions, Mr. Wolffsheim held various other positions within the Total group, where he has been employed since 1995. Mr. Wolffsheim holds a degree in engineering from the Ecole Centrale de Lyon and a degree in business administration from École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales.

Mr. Wolffsheim brings significant international strategic and financial management experience to the Board. His extensive experience in the energy industry gives him a valuable perspective on our financial strategy going forward. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. Wolffsheim should serve as a director on our Board.

Mr. Pat Wood III has served as a Principal of Wood3 Resources, an energy infrastructure developer, since July 2005. He is active in the development of electric power and natural gas infrastructure assets in North America. From 2001 to 2005 Mr. Wood served as the Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. From 1995 to 2001, he chaired the Public Utility Commission of Texas. Mr. Wood has also been an attorney with Baker & Botts, a global law firm, and an associate project engineer with Arco Indonesia, an oil and gas company, in Jakarta. He currently serves as Chairman of Dynegy, Inc., and is a director of Quanta Services, Inc. and of Memorial Resource Development Corp. He is a strategic advisor to Hunt Transmission Services/ InfraREIT Capital Partners. Mr. Wood is a past director of the American Council on Renewable Energy and is a member of the National Petroleum Council.

Mr. Wood brings significant strategic and operational management experience to the Board. Mr. Wood has demonstrated strong leadership skills through a decade of regulatory leadership in the energy sector. Mr. Wood brings a unique perspective and extensive knowledge of energy project development, public policy development, governance and the regulatory process. His legal background also provides the Board with a perspective on the legal implications of matters affecting our business. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. Wood should serve as a director on our Board, Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

Class IIIII Directors with Terms Expiring in 20172019

Mr. Thomas R. McDaniel wasMs. Catherine A. Lesjak has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Edison International, a generator and distributor of electric power and investor in infrastructure and energy assets, before retiring in July 2008 after 37 years of service. BeforeHP Inc. (formerly Hewlett- Packard Company) (HP) since January 2005, Mr. McDaniel was Chairman,1, 2007. Ms. Lesjak served as interim Chief Executive Officer of HP from August 2010 through October 2010. As a 30-year veteran at HP, Ms. Lesjak held a broad range of financial leadership roles across HP. Before being named as CFO, Ms. Lesjak served as Senior Vice President and President of Edison Mission Energy, a power generation business specializing in the development, acquisition, construction,Treasurer, responsible for managing HP’s worldwide cash, debt, foreign exchange, capital structure, risk management and operation of power production facilities. Mr. McDanielbenefits plan administration. Earlier in her career at HP, she managed financial operations for Enterprise Marketing and Solutions and the Software Global Business Unit. Before that, she was also Chief Executive Officergroup controller for HP’s Software Solutions Organization and managed HP’s global channel credit risk as controller and credit manager for the Commercial Customer Organization. Ms. Lesjak has a bachelor’s degree in biology from Stanford University and a directormaster of Edison Capital,business degree in finance from the University of California, Berkeley.

Ms. Lesjak’s extensive experience as the chief financial officer of a providermajor corporation, with significant presence in both the business-to-consumer and business-to-business markets, allows her to make significant contributions to our strategic business planning and execution. Her background is also valuable in terms of capitalfinancial oversight and financial services supportingreview of our strategic investments. It is based on the growthBoard’s identification of energythese qualifications, skills and infrastructure projects, products and services, both domestically and internationally. Mr. McDanielexperience that the Board has servedconcluded that Ms. Lesjak should serve as a director on our Board since February 2009. He is Chairman of the Board of Tendril, a smart-grid, software-as-a-service company. Mr. McDaniel is a director of SemGroup, L.P., a midstream energy services company, and a Director of Aquion Energy, a manufacturer of energy storage systems. He is also on the advisory board of Cypress Envirosystems, which develops and markets energy efficiency products. Mr. McDaniel also serves on the Advisory Board of On Ramp Wireless, a communications company serving electrical, gas and water utilities. Mr. McDaniel formerly served on the board of directors of the Senior Care Action Network (SCAN) from 2000-2013. Through the McDaniel Family Foundation, he is also actively involved in a variety of charitable activities such as the Boys and Girls Club of Huntington Beach, Heifer International and the Free Wheelchair Mission.Board.

Mr. McDanielLadislas Paszkiewicz has served as Senior Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions for Total S.A. since 2015. From 2010 to 2014, he was Senior Vice President, Americas for the Exploration and Production Division of Total S.A. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Middle East for the same division from 2007 to 2010. Mr. Paszkiewicz has also served as General Manager of the Total group’s subsidiary in Argentina, as head of the Investor Relations Department of Total S.A., and in various other positions in the Total group, which he joined in 1985. Mr. Paszkiewicz holds a master’s degree in business administration from New York University and a master’s degree in finance from the Insitut d’Etudes Politiques in Paris, France.

Mr. Paszkiewicz brings significant operationalinternational strategic and business development experience to the Board. Mr. McDaniel’sHis extensive experience growing and operating global electric power businesses is directly aligned with our efforts to further developin the utility and power plant portionsenergy industry gives him a valuable perspective on the development of our business. In addition, Mr. McDaniel’s prior experience as a Chief Financial Officer qualifies him as a financial expert, which is relevant to his duties as an audit committee member.strategy going forward. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. McDanielPaszkiewicz should serve as a director on our Board, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Finance Committee.Board.

Mr. Humbert de WendelJulien Pouget has served as the Total group Treasurer since the beginning of 2012. Previously, Mr. de Wendel served as the Senior Vice President of Corporate Business Development forthe Renewables division of Total from 2006S.A. since January 1, 2017. From 2014 to 2011. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. de Wendel2016, he served as a senior advisor to the President of France, initially responsible for industry, then industry and digital, and finally for the economy. His responsibilities during this time included the restructuring of the French nuclear industry. Prior to his service to the president, Mr. Pouget spent six years in various positions at Alstom Power, including as Vice President of the heat exchangers product line for Total, overseeing finance operationsFrance, Switzerland, and China, as Vice President and General Manager of its explorationAsian activities and production subsidiaries. Before

that, heas project leader and as head of engineering for the heat exchangers on the Flamanville 3 EPR nuclear plant in France. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Pouget held othervarious positions withinin the Total group, where he has been employed since 1982.French Ministry of Industry, and at the state shareholding agency at the French Ministry for Finance and Economy. Mr. Pouget is a chief engineer of the prestigious French Corps de Wendel holds a degree in law and economics from the Institut d’études Politiques de Paris,Mines and a degree in business administration fromgraduate of the École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales.Polytechnique.

Mr. de WendelPouget brings extensivesignificant international experience in financemanagerial and business developmentoperational experience to the Board. ThisHis extensive experience allowsin the energy industry and in government gives him to bringa valuable perspective to our relationships with our key financialon policy and industrial partners.the global energy marketplace. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. de WendelPouget should serve as a director on our Board.

Mr. Thomas H. Werner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2010, as a member of our Board since June 2003, and Chairman of the Board since May 2011. From June 2003 to April 2010, Mr. Werner served as our Chief Executive Officer. Before joining SunPower, from 2001 to 2003, he held the position of Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Light Machines, Inc., an optical solutions subsidiary of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Werner was Vice President and General Manager of the Business Connectivity Group of 3Com Corp., a network solutions company. He has also held a number of executive management positions at Oak Industries, Inc. and General Electric Co. Mr. Werner currently serves as a board member of Cree, Inc., Silver Spring Networks, and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. Mr. Werner is on the Board of Trustees of Marquette University. Mr. Werner holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the University of Wisconsin Madison, a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Marquette University and a master’s degree in business administration from George Washington University.

Mr. Werner brings significant leadership, technical, operational and financial management experience to the Board. Mr. Werner provides the Board with valuable insight into management’s perspective with respect to our operations. Mr. Werner has demonstrated strong executive leadership skills through nearly 20 years of executive officer service with various companies and brings the most comprehensive view of our operational history over the past several years. Mr. Werner also brings to the Board leadership experience through his service on the board of directors for two other organizations, which gives him the ability to compare the way in which management and the boards operate within the companies he serves. It is based on the Board’s identification of these qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has concluded that Mr. Werner should serve as a director on our Board and Chairman of the Board.

Vote Required

Election of a director requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of votes represented by the shares in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. The three persons receiving the greatest number of votes at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as Class IIIII directors. Neither “broker non-votes” nor abstentions will affect the outcome of the voting on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF EACH OF THE CLASS IIIII DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

BOARD STRUCTURE

Determination of Independence

Our Board has determined that three of our nine directors, namely Ms. Lesjak and Messrs. McDaniel and Wood, and Ms. Lesjak, each meet the standards for independence as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market and rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Werner, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Messrs. Chaperon, Clement, Giorno,Kristoffersen, Lauré, Paszkiewicz, Pouget and de Wendel,Wolffsheim, as directors designated by our controlling stockholder Total Energies Nouvelles Activités USA, SAS, formerly known as Total Gas & Power USA, SAS, pursuant to our Affiliation Agreement with Total, are not “independent” as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The Board has determined that having a lead independent director assist Mr. Werner, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is in the best interest of our stockholders. Mr. Wood has served as the lead independent director of the Board since June 2012. The Board believes this structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our company and encourages active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of the Board. We believe that this leadership structure also is preferred by a significant number of our stockholders.

The Board is actively involved in oversight of risks that could affect our company. This oversight is conducted primarily through committees of the Board, in particular our Audit Committee, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees below and in the respective charters of each committee. The full Board, however, has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each committee chair regarding the committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from our officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within our company.

Board Meetings

Our Board held four regular, quarterly meetings, one annual meeting and ninesix special meetings during fiscal 2015.2016. During fiscal 2015,2016, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and its committees on which such director served during his or her term. Our independent directors held four executive sessions during regular, quarterly meetings without management present during fiscal 2015.2016.

Controlled Company, NASDAQ Listing Standards

Since the Tender Offer in June 2011 (including as of March 17, 2015)2017) Total has owned greater than 50% of our outstanding voting securities and we are therefore considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of The NASDAQ Stock Market rules. As long as we remain a “controlled company,” we are exempt from the rules that would otherwise require that our Board be composed of a majority of independent directors and that our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee be composed entirely of independent directors. This “controlled company” exception does not modify the independence requirements for the Audit Committee, and we comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and The NASDAQ Stock Market rules that require that our Audit Committee be composed exclusively of independent directors.

Board Committees

We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure that we are managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. Our Board has established committees to ensure that we maintain strong corporate governance standards. Our Board has standing Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. The charters of our Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are available on our website athttp://investors.sunpower.com. You may also request copies of our committee charters free of charge by writing to SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Below is a summary of our committee structure and membership information.

(I) Indicates an independent director.

(*) Indicates the lead independent director.

Audit Committee

Mr. McDaniel is the Chairman of the Audit Committee, appointed in June 2012. Our Audit Committee is a separately-designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is “independent” as that term is defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act and as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and has the financial sophistication required by the applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Board has determined that each of Ms. Lesjak and Mr. McDaniel meet the criteria of an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of applicable SEC regulations due to their professional experience. Mr. McDaniel’s and Ms. Lesjak’s relevant professional experience is described above under “Proposal One—Re-election of Class IIIII Directors.” The Audit Committee held nineeight meetings during fiscal 2015.2016.

The purpose of the Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, is, among other things, to:

The Audit Committee also serves as the representative of the Board with respect to its oversight of the matters described below in the “Audit Committee Report.” The Audit Committee has established procedures for (1) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (2) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee promptly reviews such complaints and concerns.

Compensation Committee

Mr. Wood is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, appointed in November 2012. Two of the four members of the Compensation Committee, Messrs. McDaniel and Wood, are “independent” as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Messrs. ClémentMs. Kristoffersen and de WendelMr. Pouget were designated by Total to be on the Compensation Committee pursuant to our Affiliation Agreement with Total. The Compensation Committee held sixfive meetings during fiscal 2015.

The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its charter, assists the Board in discharging its duties with respect to:

We also have a Section 16/162(m) Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee consisting solely of independent directors available to approve certain compensation matters in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, each as recommended by the Compensation Committee.

In certain instances, the Compensation Committee has delegated limited authority to Mr. Werner, in his capacity as a Board member, with respect to compensation and equity awards for employees other than our executive officers. For more information on our processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Compensation Committee was at any time during fiscal 20152016 one of our officers or employees, or is one of our former officers or employees. No member of our Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 and Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K. Additionally, during fiscal 2015,2016, none of our executive officers or directors was a member of the board of directors, or any committee of the board of directors, or of any other entity such that the relationship would be construed to constitute a compensation committee interlock within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Wood is the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Two of the four members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Messrs. McDaniel and Wood, are “independent” as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Messrs. Lauré and GiornoPaszkiewicz were designated by Total to be on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee pursuant to our Affiliation Agreement with Total. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2015.2016.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, pursuant to its charter, assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities with respect to:

The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers diversity in identifying nominees for directors. In particular, the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the members of the Board should reflect a diverse range of talent, skill and expertise sufficient to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that the Board as a whole must have the right diversity, mix of characteristics and skills for the optimal functioning of the Board in its oversight role.

The Nominating and Governance Committee believes the Board should be composed of persons with skills in areas such as:

Under our Corporate Governance Principles, during the director nominee evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board take the following into account:

Finance Committee

Mr. McDaniel is the Chairman of the Finance Committee. Two of the four members of the Finance Committee, Ms. Lesjak and Mr. McDaniel, are “independent” as defined by applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. Messrs. ChaperonMs. Kristoffersen and de WendelMr. Wolffsheim were designated by Total to be on the Finance Committee pursuant to our Affiliation Agreement with Total. The Finance Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2015.2016.

The Finance Committee, pursuant to its charter, assists the Board in discharging its duties with respect to:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Stockholder Communications with Board of Directors

We provide a process by which stockholders may send communications to our Board, any committee of the Board, our non-management directors or any particular director. Stockholders can contact our non-management directors by sending such communications to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134. Stockholders wishing to communicate with a particular Board member, a particular Board committee or the Board as a whole, may send a written communication to our Corporate Secretary, SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134. The Corporate Secretary will forward such communication to the full Board, to the appropriate committee or to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is addressed, unless the communication is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, or harassing, in which case the Corporate Secretary has the authority to discard the communication or take appropriate legal action regarding the communication.

Directors’ Attendance at Our Annual Meetings

Although we do not have a formal policy that mandates the attendance of our directors at our annual stockholder meetings, our directors are encouraged to attend. All of our nine directors are expected to attend the 20162017 Annual Meeting, and eight of our nine directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders held on June 3, 2015April 28, 2016 (the “2015“2016 Annual Meeting”).

Submission of Stockholder Proposals for the 20172018 Annual Meeting

As a SunPower stockholder, you may submit a proposal, including director nominations, for consideration at future annual meetings of stockholders.

Stockholder Proposals. Only stockholders meeting certain criteria outlined in our By-laws are eligible to submit nominations for election to the Board or to propose other proper business for consideration by stockholders at an annual meeting. Under the By-laws, stockholders who wish to nominate persons for election to the Board or propose other proper business for consideration by stockholders at an annual meeting must give proper written notice to us not earlier than the 120th day and not later than the 90th day before the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, provided that in the event that an annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 25 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which we mail or publicly announce our notice of the date of the annual meeting, whichever occurs first. Therefore, notices regarding nominations of persons for election to the Board and proposals of other proper business for consideration at the 20172018 annual meeting of stockholders must be submitted to us no earlier than December 29, 2016and28, 2017 and no later than January 28, 2017.27, 2018. If the date of the 20172018 annual meeting is moved more than 25 days before or after the anniversary date of the 20162017 annual meeting, the deadline will instead be the close of business on the 10th day following notice of the date of the 20172018 annual meeting of stockholders or public disclosure of such date, whichever occurs first. We have discretionary power, but are not obligated, to consider stockholder proposals submitted after January 28, 201727, 2018 for the 20172018 annual meeting.

Stockholder proposals will also need to comply with SEC regulations, such as Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in any Company-sponsored proxy material. In order to be included in our proxy materials for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act the submission deadline for stockholder proposals is November 17, 2016.2017. All written proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary, at our corporate offices at 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134 by the close of business on the required deadline in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20172018 annual meeting of stockholders.

Nomination of Director Candidates.Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Such nominations should be directed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134. In addition, the stockholder must give notice of a nomination to our Corporate Secretary, and such notice must be received within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals.” Any such proposal must include the following:

If a director nomination is made pursuant to the process set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same criteria in evaluating the nominee as it would any other board nominee candidate, and will recommend to the Board whether or not the stockholder nominee should be included as a candidate for election in our proxy statement. The nominee and nominating stockholder should be willing to provide any information reasonably requested by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with its evaluation. The Board will make the final determination whether or not a nominee will be included in the proxy statement and on the proxy card for election.

Once either a search firm selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or a stockholder has provided our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with the identity of a prospective candidate, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee communicates the identity and known background and experience of the candidate to the Board. If warranted by a polling of the Board, members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and/or other members of our senior management may interview the candidate. If the Nominating and Governance Committee reacts favorably to a candidate, the candidate is next invited to interview with the members of the Board who are not on the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee then makes a final determination whether to recommend the candidate to the Board for directorship. The Nominating and Governance Committee currently has not set specific, minimum qualifications or criteria for nominees that it proposes for Board membership, but evaluates the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes, however, that we will be best served if our directors bring to the Board a variety of diverse experience and backgrounds and, among other things, demonstrated integrity, executive leadership and financial, marketing or business knowledge and experience. See “Board Structure—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” for factors considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board in considering director nominees.

Corporate Governance Principles

We believe that strong corporate governance practices are the foundation of a successful, well-run company. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles that set forth our core corporate governance principles, including:

Our Corporate Governance Principles are available on our website athttp://investors.sunpower.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Related Persons Transactions Policy and Procedures

It is our general policy to conduct our business activities and transactions with the highest level of integrity and ethical standards and in accordance with all applicable laws. In addition, it is our policy to avoid situations that create an actual or potential conflict between our interests and the personal interests of our officers and directors. Such principles are described in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to our directors, officers, and employees (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and is designed to promote compliance with the laws applicable to our business, accounting standards, and proper and ethical business methods and practices. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website athttp://investors.sunpower.com/corporate-governance.cfmunder the link for “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.” You may also request a copy by writing to us at SunPower Corporation, 77 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134, Attention: Corporate Secretary. If we amend our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grant a waiver applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer, we will post a copy of such amendment or waiver on our website. Under our Corporate Governance Principles, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending changes to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles and our Audit Committee Charter, our Audit Committee will consider questions of actual and potential conflicts of interest (including corporate opportunities) of directors and officers, and approve or prohibit such transactions. The Audit Committee will review and approve in advance all proposed related-party transactions that would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, in compliance with the applicable NASDAQ Stock Market rules. A related-party transaction will only be approved if the Audit Committee determines that it is in our best interests. If a director is involved in the transaction, he or she will be recused from all voting and approval processes in connection with the transaction.

Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions

Other than the compensation agreements and other arrangements described herein, and the transactions described below, since the start of our last fiscal year on December 29, 2014,January 4, 2016, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we have been or will be a party:

Agreements with Total Energies Nouvelles Activités USA, SAS and Total S.A.

Tender Offer Agreement and Tender Offer Agreement Guaranty

On April 28, 2011, we and Total entered into the Tender Offer Agreement, pursuant to which, on June 21, 2011, Total purchased approximately 60% of our then-outstanding shares of common stock for a total cost of approximately $1.4 billion.

Tenesol Stock Purchase Agreement, Private Placement Agreement, and Master Agreement

On December 23, 2011, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Total, under which we agreed to acquire 100% of the equity interests of Tenesol SA (“Tenesol”) from Total for $165.4 million in cash. The Tenesol acquisition was consummated on January 31, 2012. Tenesol is a European-based manufacturer and developer of solar projects with module manufacturing operations in France and South Africa.

Contemporaneously with the execution of the Tenesol Stock Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Private Placement Agreement with Total, under which Total agreed to purchase, and we agreed to issue and sell 18.6 million shares of our common stock for a purchase price of $8.80 per share. The sale was completed contemporaneously with the closing of the Tenesol acquisition on January 31, 2012, thereby increasing Total’s ownership to approximately 66% of our outstanding common stock as of such date.

On December 23, 2011, we also entered into a Master Agreement with Total, under which we and Total agreed to a framework of transactions related to the Tenesol acquisition and Private Placement Agreement. Additionally, Total agreed to pursue several negotiations on additional agreements related to directly investing in our R&D program over a multi-year period, the purchase of our modules and the development of a multi-megawatt project using our products. We and Total amended the Master Agreement on December 20, 2012 to clarify that the development of the multi-megawatt project using our products meant development of up to 10 LCPV Tracker demonstration projects at a total cost to Total of not more than $2.5 million provided agreements for such projects were entered into before December 31, 2013. On July 22, 2014 we and Total agreed to extend the deadline for development of the LCPV Tracker demonstration projects from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

Credit Support Agreement

In connection with the Tender Offer, on April 28, 2011, we entered into a Credit Support Agreement with Total S.A. Pursuant to the Credit Support Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions described below, Total S.A., as “Guarantor” has agreed to enter into one or more guarantee agreements (each a “Guaranty”) with banks providing letter of credit facilities to us or our subsidiaries in support of our utility and power plant (“UPP”) and large commercial portion of the residential and commercial segment (“LComm”) businesses and certain other permitted purposes. Pursuant to such Guarantees, Guarantor would guarantee the payment to the applicable bank of our obligation to reimburse a draw on a letter of credit and pay interest thereon in accordance with the letter of credit facility between such bank and us. The Credit Support Agreement became effective on June 28, 2011 (the “CSA Effective Date”), and was amended on June 7, 2011, December 12, 2011 and December 14, 2012.2012, and was amended and restated on June 29, 2016.

Under the Credit Support Agreement, at any time from the CSA Effective Date until the fifth anniversary thereof, we maycould request that Guarantor provide a Guaranty with respect to a letter of credit facility. Guarantor iswas required to issue and enter into the Guaranty requested by us subject to certain terms and conditions, any of which maycould be waived by Total S.A. The aggregate

letter of credit amount could not exceed $936 million for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and cannot exceed $1 billion for the period from January 1, 2016 through the termination of the Credit Support Agreement (the “Maximum L/C Amount”), subject to certain adjustments.

Payments to be Paid by us to the Guarantor. In consideration for the commitments of Guarantor, we arewere required to pay Guarantor a guarantee fee, repay any payments made under any Guaranty plus interest, and pay certain expenses of Guarantor and interest on overdue amounts owed to Guarantor. The guarantee fee for each letter of credit that iswas the subject of a Guaranty and was outstanding for all or part of the preceding calendar quarter will bewas equal to: (w) the average daily amount of the undrawn amount of such letter of credit plus the amount drawn on such letter of credit that hashad not yet been reimbursed by us or Guarantor, (x) multiplied by 1.85% for letters of credit issued or extended from the third anniversary of the CSA Effective Date until the fourth anniversary of the CSA Effective Date and 2.35% for letters of credit issued or extended from the fourth anniversary of the CSA Effective Date until the fifth anniversary of the CSA Effective Date, (y) multiplied by the number of days that such letter of credit was outstanding, (z) divided by 365. We arewere required to reimburse payments made by Guarantor under any Guaranty within 30 days plus interest at a rate equal to LIBOR (as in effect as of the date of Guarantor’s payment) plus 3.00%. The expenses of Guarantor to be reimbursed by us includeincluded reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred after the CSA Effective Date in the performance of its services under the Credit Support Agreement and reasonable out-of-pocket attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with payments to a bank under a Guaranty or enforcement of any of our obligations. Overdue payment obligations accrueaccrued interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR as in effect at such time such payment was due plus 5.00%. Finally, we arewere solely responsible for any bank fees incurred in connection with securing any letter of credit facilities. In fiscal 2015, we incurred guaranty fees of approximately $11.2 million to Total S.A.facilities

Benchmark Credit Terms. Annually not later than every June 30, and also at any time we desiredesired to obtain a letter of credit facility that would be the subject of a Guaranty, we arewere required to solicit benchmark credit terms for a letter of credit facility without a Guaranty from Guarantor and without collateral and report those benchmark terms to Guarantor. If (a) the annual fees payable by us on the issued amount of a letter of credit under a proposed letter of credit facility that iswas not guaranteed by Guarantor arewere equal to or less than 110% of the annual fees plus any applicable guarantee fee payable to Guarantor pursuant to a guaranteed letter of credit facility under the Credit Support Agreement, (b) the other fees payable under such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility arewere reasonable in light of the fees payable under a guaranteed letter of credit facility and the anticipated uses of such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility and (c) the other terms and conditions of such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility (including restrictive

covenants) arewere reasonable in light of the anticipated use of such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility, then (i) we will bewere required to enter into such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility as soon as commercially reasonable, (ii) we will bewere required to reduce the commitments under guaranteed letter of credit facilities in an amount equal to such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility and (iii) so long as such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility remainsremained in effect, the Maximum L/C Amount during such period will bewas reduced by the maximum aggregate amount of the letters of credit that maycould be issued pursuant to such non-guaranteed letter of credit facility.

Covenants of SunPower. Under the Credit Support Agreement, we have agreed to undertake certain actions, including, but not limited to, ensuring that our payment obligations to Guarantor rankranked at least equal in right of payment with all of our other present and future indebtedness, other than certain permitted secured indebtedness. We have agreed to refrain from taking certain actions as detailed in the Credit Support Agreement, including (1) amending any agreements related to any guaranteed letter of credit facility, (2) granting any lien to secure indebtedness unless (a) an identical lien iswas granted to Guarantor and (b) such other lien iswas at all times equal or subordinate to the priority of the lien granted to Guarantor under (a), and (3) making any equity distributions.

Trigger Events. Under the Credit Support Agreement, following a Trigger Event (as defined in the agreement and described below), and during its continuation, Guarantor maycould elect not to enter into any additional Guarantees; declare all or any portion of the outstanding amounts owed by us to Guarantor to be due and payable; direct banks that havehad provided guaranteed letter of credit facilities to stop all issuances of any additional letters of credit under such facilities; access and inspect our relevant financial records and other documents upon reasonable notice to us; and exercise all other rights it may have had under applicable law, provided that at its discretion Guarantor maycould also rescind such actions.

Each of the following events constitutesconstituted a “Trigger Event”:

Termination. The Credit Support Agreement was scheduled to terminate following the fifth anniversary of the CSA Effective Date, after the later of the payment in full of all obligations thereunder and the termination or expiration of each Guaranty provided thereunder. The Credit Support Agreement was amended and restated on June 29, 2016.

Amended and Restated Credit Support Agreement

On June 29, 2016, we and Total S.A. entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Support Agreement (the “A&R Credit Support Agreement”), which amended and restated the Credit Support Agreement.

Under the A&R Credit Support Agreement, Total S.A. has agreed to enter into one or more Guaranties with banks providing letter of credit facilities to us in support of certain of our businesses and for other permitted purposes. Total S.A. will guarantee the payment to the applicable issuing bank of our obligation to reimburse a draw on a letter of credit and pay interest thereon in accordance with the letter of credit facility between such bank and us. The A&R Credit Support Agreement became effective on June 29, 2016 (the “A&R CSA Effective Date”). Under the Credit Support Agreement, at any time from the A&R CSA Effective Date until December 31, 2018, we may request that Total S.A. provide a Guaranty in support of our payment obligations with respect to a letter of credit facility. Such letters of credit must be issued no later than December 31, 2018 and expire no later than March 31, 2020. Total S.A. is required to issue and enter into the Guaranty requested by us, subject to certain terms and conditions. In addition, Total S.A. will not be required to enter into the Guaranty if, after giving effect to our request for a Guaranty, the sum of (a) the aggregate amount available to be drawn under all guaranteed letter of credit facilities, (b) the amount of letters of credit available to be issued under any guaranteed facility, and (c) the aggregate amount of draws (including accrued but unpaid interest) on any letters of credit issued under any guaranteed facility that have not yet been reimbursed by us, would exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Such maximum amounts of credit support available to us can be reduced upon the occurrence of specified events.

In consideration for the commitments of Total S.A. pursuant to the A&R Credit Support Agreement, we are required to pay Total S.A. a guaranty fee for each letter of credit that is the subject of a Guaranty and was outstanding for all or part of the preceding calendar quarter, which fee (applied on a tiered basis) will be equal to: (x) the average daily amount of the undrawn amount outstanding on each guaranteed letter of credit plus any drawn amounts that have not been reimbursed by us or Total S.A., (y) multiplied by (1) 2.35% for letters of credit issued or extended if our leverage ratio (subject to reduction or increase consistent with the minimum leverage covenant set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement among us, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (“Crédit Agricole”), as agent, and the lenders party thereto, as amended from time to time) (the “Leverage Ratio”) is less than or equal to 4.5 to 1.0; or (2) if the Leverage Ratio is greater than 4.5 to 1.0, 2.35% for letters of credit issued or extended for amounts less than $200 million; 4.50% for amounts greater than or equal to $200 million and less than $300 million; 6.50% for amounts greater than or equal to $300 million and less than $400 million; and 8.00% for amounts greater than or equal to $400 million and less than or equal to $500 million (z) multiplied by the number of days during such calendar quarter that such letter of credit was outstanding, divided by 365. As an example, if at the end of a fiscal quarter our leverage ratio is greater than 4.5 to 1.0 and we had $250 million in letters of credit outstanding during 50 days of the preceding calendar quarter, the guarantee fee would be equal to $0.95 million (($200 million * 2.35% + $50 million * 4.5%) * 50/365). In addition, we are required to pay Total S.A. a commitment fee equal to 0.50% times the average daily available facility amount for the preceding calendar quarter. We are also required to reimburse Total S.A. for payments made under any Guaranty and certain expenses of Total S.A., plus interest on both. In fiscal 2016, we incurred guaranty fees of approximately $7.1 million to Total S.A. under the Credit Support Agreement and the A&R Credit Support Agreement.

We have agreed to undertake certain actions, including, but not limited to, ensuring that our payment obligations to Total S.A. rank at least equal in right of payment with all of our other present and future indebtedness, other than certain permitted secured indebtedness. We have also agreed to refrain from taking certain actions, including refraining from making any dividend distributions so long as it has any outstanding repayment obligation to Total S.A. resulting from a draw on a guaranteed letter of credit.

The A&R Credit Support Agreement will terminate following December 31, 2018, after the later of the satisfaction of all obligations thereunder and the termination or expiration of each Guaranty provided thereunder.

The A&R Credit Support Agreement may not be assigned by us without the prior written consent of Total S.A. Total S.A., as the initial guarantor (but not any assignee of Total S.A.), may assign its rights and obligations under the A&R Credit Support Agreement without our consent to an entity that is a Total S.A. subsidiary and which satisfies certain credit requirements. In connection with an assignment to an assignee that is rated lower than A/A2, Total S.A. would be required to either (a) pay to us an assignment fee equal to $10 million as of June 29, 2016 and reduced by $1 million at the beginning of each calendar quarter thereafter until reduced to zero (for example, the fee payable for an assignment on March 17, 2017 would be $7 million) or (b) agree to pay us a make-whole amount based on a calculation of the amount actually paid by us to banks that are party to letter of credit facilities (both guaranteed and non-guaranteed) and to lenders in revolving credit facilities permitted under the A&R Credit Support Agreement in increased costs as a result of Total S.A.’s assignment of its rights and obligations under the A&R Credit Support Agreement. Such make-whole amount would be payable on a quarterly basis from the assignment date through the termination date of the A&R Credit Support Agreement.

Under the A&R Credit Support Agreement, we have agreed to undertake certain actions, including, but not limited to, ensuring that our payment obligations to Total S.A. rank at least equal in right of payment with all of our other present and future indebtedness, other than certain permitted secured indebtedness. We also agreed to refrain from taking certain actions as detailed in the A&R Credit Support Agreement, including (1) amending any agreements related to any guaranteed letter of credit facility, (2) granting any lien to secure indebtedness unless (a) an identical lien was granted to Total S.A. and (b) such other lien was at all times equal or subordinate to the priority of the lien granted to Total S.A. under (a), and (3) making any equity distributions.

Under the A&R Credit Support Agreement, following a Trigger Event (as defined in the agreement and described below), and during its continuation, Total S.A. could elect not to enter into any additional Guarantees; declare all or any portion of the outstanding amounts owed by us to Total S.A. to be due and payable; direct banks that had provided guaranteed letter of credit facilities to stop all issuances of any additional letters of credit under such facilities; access and inspect our relevant financial records and other documents upon reasonable notice to us; and exercise all other rights it may have had under applicable law, provided that at its discretion Total S.A. could also rescind such actions.

Each of the following events constitute a “Trigger Event”:

Termination. The Credit Support Agreement is scheduled to terminate following the fifth anniversary of the CSA Effective Date, after the later of the payment in full of all obligations thereunder and the termination or expiration of each Guaranty provided thereunder.

Affiliation Agreement

In connection with the Tender Offer, we and Total entered into an affiliation agreement (the “Affiliation Agreement”). The Affiliation Agreement was amended on June 7, 2011, December 12, 2011, February 28, 2012 and August 10, 2012. The Affiliation Agreement governs the relationship following the closing of the Tender Offer between SunPower, on the one hand, and Total S.A., Total, any other affiliate of Total S.A. and any member of a group of persons formed for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting, disposing of or beneficially owning our voting stock of which Total S.A. or any of its affiliates is a member (the “Total Group”), on the other hand.

Standstill. Following the closing of the Tender Offer and during the Standstill Period (as defined below), Total, Total S.A., and the Total Group may not:

In addition, no member of the Total Group may, among other things, solicit proxies relating to the election of directors to our Board without the prior approval of the Disinterested Directors.

The Total Group is, however, permitted to either (i) make and consummate a Total Tender Offer or (ii) propose and effect a Total Merger so long as, in each case, Total complies with certain advance notice and prior negotiation obligations, including providing written notice to us at least 120 days before commencing or proposing such Total Tender Offer or Total Merger and making its designees reasonably available for the purpose of negotiation with the Disinterested Directors concerning such Total Tender Offer or Total Merger.

The “Standstill Period” is the period beginning on the date of the Affiliation Agreement and ending on the earlier to occur of:

The “Applicable Standstill Limit” is 70% of the lower of (i) the then outstanding shares of our common stock or (ii) the then outstanding voting power of our company.

During the Standstill Period, the Total Group will not be in breach of its standstill obligations described above if any member of the Total Group holds beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock in excess of the Applicable Standstill Limit solely as a result of:

Transfer of Control. If any member or members of the Total Group seek to transfer, in one or a series of transactions, either (i) 40% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock or (ii) 40% or more of the outstanding voting power of our company to a single person or group, then such transfer must be conditioned on, and may not be effected, unless the transferee either:

Total’s Rights to Maintain. The Total Group has the following rights to maintain its ownership in us until (i) the first time that the Total Group owns less than 40% of the outstanding voting power of our company, or (ii) until the first time that Total transfers shares of our common stock to a person other than Total S.A. or a controlled subsidiary of Total S.A. and as a result of such transfer Total S.A. and its subsidiaries own less than 50% of the outstanding voting power of our company.

If we propose to issue new securities primarily for cash in a financing transaction, then Total has the right to purchase a portion of such new securities equal to its percentage ownership in us. Total can also elect to purchase our securities in open market transactions or through privately-negotiated transactions in an amount equal to its percentage ownership in connection with such issuance of new securities. If we propose to issue new securities in consideration for our purchase of a business or assets of a business, then Total has the right to purchase additional securities in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions equal to its percentage ownership in us. Total has similar rights in the event that we issue or propose to issue (including pursuant to our equity plans or as the result of the conversion of our convertible securities) securities that, together with all other issuances of securities by us since the end of the preceding fiscal quarter aggregate to more than 1% of our fully diluted equity. Total has a nine-month grace period, subject to certain extensions to satisfy regulatory conditions, to acquire securities in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions in connection with any of the securities issuances described above.

SunPower Board. The Affiliation Agreement provides that Total is entitled to designate nominees to our Board, subject to the maintenance of certain ownership thresholds described below. See “Proposal One”above for more details on our current Board membership.

So long as Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns at least 10% of the outstanding voting power of our company, then our Board must use its reasonable best efforts to elect the directors designated by Total as follows:

For as long as they are serving on our Board, the directors designated by Total will be allocated across the three classes that comprise our Board in a manner as equal as practicable.

Subject to the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, until the first time that Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns less than 30% of the outstanding voting power of our company:

Until the first time that Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., own less than 10% of the outstanding voting power of our company, a representative of Total will, subject to certain exceptions, be permitted to attend all meetings of our Board or any committee thereof in a non-voting, observer capacity (other than any committee whose sole purpose is to consider a transaction for which there exists an actual conflict of interest between the Total Group, on the one hand, and us and any of our affiliates, on the other hand).

Events Requiring Specific Board Approval. At any time when Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns at least 30% of the outstanding voting power of our company, neither the Total Group nor we (or any of our affiliates) may effect any of the following without first obtaining the approval of a majority of the Disinterested Directors:

Events Requiring Supermajority Board Approval. At any time when Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns at least 30% of the outstanding voting power of our company, neither Total nor we (nor any of Total’s or our affiliates, respectively) may, without first obtaining the approval of two-thirds of our directors (including at least one Disinterested Director), effect any approval or adoption of our annual operating plan or budget that has the effect of reducing the planned letter of credit utilization in any given year by more than 10% below the applicable maximum letter of credit amount in the Credit Support Agreement.

Events Requiring Stockholder Approval by Total. Until the first time that Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns 50% or less of the outstanding voting power of our company or 40% or less of the outstanding voting power of our company when at least $100 million in Guarantees are outstanding pursuant to the Credit Support Agreement and, thereafter, for so long as (1) any loans by Total S.A. to us remain outstanding, (2) any guarantees by Total S.A. of any of our indebtedness remain outstanding, or (3) any other continuing obligation of Total S.A. to or for the benefit of us remain outstanding (“Total Stockholder Approval Period”), neither we (including any of our controlled subsidiaries) nor our Board may effect any of the following without first obtaining the approval of Total:

Certain Matters Related to SunPower’s Shareholder Rights Plan. Until the Total Group beneficially owns less than 15% of the outstanding voting power of our company, neither we nor our Board is permitted to adopt any shareholder rights plan or make certain changes to our existing shareholder rights plan without the approval of Total.

Covenants of Total and SunPower.In order to effect the transactions contemplated by the Affiliation Agreement, each of Total and we have committed to taking certain actions. With respect to us, such actions include:

Termination. The Affiliation Agreement generally terminates upon the earlier to occur of (i) Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owning less than 10% of the outstanding voting power of our company or (ii) Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owning 100% of the outstanding voting power of our company.

Affiliation Agreement Guaranty

Total S.A. entered into a guaranty (the “Affiliation Agreement Guaranty”) in connection with the Tender Offer and entry into the Affiliation Agreement, pursuant to which Total S.A. unconditionally guarantees the full and prompt payment of Total S.A.’s, Total’s and each Total S.A. controlled company’s payment obligations under the Affiliation Agreement and the full and prompt performance of their respective representations, warranties, covenants, duties and agreements contained in the Affiliation Agreement.

Research & Collaboration Agreement

In connection with the Tender Offer, we and Total entered into a Research & Collaboration Agreement (the “R&D Agreement”) that establishesestablished a framework under which the parties maycould engage in long-term research and development collaboration (the “R&D Collaboration”). The R&D Collaboration is expected to encompassencompassed a number of different projects (“R&D Projects”), with a focus on advancing technology in the area of photovoltaics. The primary purpose of the R&D Collaboration iswas to: (i) maintain and expand our technology position in the crystalline silicon domain; (ii) ensure our industrial competitiveness; and (iii) guarantee a sustainable position for both us and Total to be best-in-class industry players.

The R&D Agreement contemplatescontemplated a joint committee (the “R&D Strategic Committee”) that identifies, plansidentified, planned and managesmanaged the R&D Collaboration. Due to the impracticability of anticipating and establishing all of the legal and business terms that willwould be applicable to the R&D Collaboration or to each R&D Project, the R&D Agreement setsset forth broad principles applicable to the parties’ potential R&D Collaboration, and the R&D Collaboration Committee establishesestablished the particular terms governing each particular R&D Project consistent with the terms set forth in the R&D Agreement. In fiscal 2015,2016, Total contributed $1.6$0.6 million to us under the R&D Agreement.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the Tender Offer, we and Total entered into a customary registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) related to Total’s ownership of shares of our common stock. The Registration Rights Agreement provides Total with shelf registration rights, subject to certain customary exceptions, and up to two demand registration rights in any 12-month

period, also subject to certain customary exceptions. Total also has certain rights to participate in any registrations of securities that we initiate. We will generally pay all costs and expenses we incur and that Total incurs in connection with any shelf or demand registration (other than selling expenses incurred by Total). We and Total have also agreed to certain indemnification rights under the agreement. The Registration Rights Agreement terminates on the first date on which: (i) the shares held by Total constitute less than 5% of our then-outstanding common stock; (ii) all of our securities held by Total may be immediately resold pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Exchange Act during any 90-day period without any volume limitation or other restriction; or (iii) we cease to be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.

The Registration Rights Agreement was amended on May 29, 2013, in connection with the issuance of our 0.75% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2018, to provide that convertible debentures and our common stock underlying such debentures are “registrable securities” within the meaning of the Registration Rights Agreement.

Stockholder Rights Plan

On April 28, 2011, before the execution of the Tender Offer Agreement, we entered into an amendment (the “Rights Agreement Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement, dated August 12, 2008, by and between us and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agreement”), in order to, among other things, render the rights therein inapplicable to each of: (i) the approval, execution or delivery of the Tender Offer Agreement; (ii) the commencement or consummation of the Tender Offer; (iii) the consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Tender Offer Agreement and the related agreements; and (iv) the public or other announcement of any of the foregoing.

On June 14, 2011, we entered into a second amendment to the Rights Agreement (the “Second Rights Agreement Amendment”), in order to, among other things, exempt Total, Total S.A. and certain of their affiliates and certain members of a group of which they may become members from the definition of “Acquiring Person” thereunder, such that the rights issuable pursuant to the Rights Agreement will not become issuable in connection with the completion of the Tender Offer.

By-laws Amendment

On June 14, 2011, our Board approved amendments of our By-laws as required under the Affiliation Agreement. The amendments: (i) allow any member of the Total Group to call a meeting of stockholders for the sole purpose of considering and voting on a proposal to effect a Total Merger or a Transferee Merger (as defined in the Affiliation Agreement); (ii) provide that the number of directors of our Board shall be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of our entire Board at any regular or special meeting; and (iii) require, before the termination of the Affiliation Agreement, the approval of a majority of our independent directors to amend our By-laws so long as Total, together with the controlled subsidiaries of Total S.A., owns at least 30% of our voting securities as well as require, before the termination of the Affiliation Agreement, Total’s written consent during the Total Stockholder Approval Period to amend the By-laws. In addition, in November 2011, our By-laws were amended to remove restrictions prohibiting stockholder consents in writing.

The Credit Support Agreement, Amended and Restated Credit Support Agreement, Affiliation Agreement, Affiliation Agreement Guaranty, Research and Collaboration Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement, Rights Agreement Amendment, Second Rights Agreement Amendment and By-Law amendments, and amendments thereto, as described above are attached to, and more fully described in, our Form 8-Ks as filed with the SEC on May 2, 2011, June 7, 2011, June 15, 2011 and December 23, 2011, our Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Form 14D-9 filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011, and our Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on November 2, 2012.

Upfront Warrant

On February 28, 2012, in consideration for Total S.A.’s agreement to enter into a Liquidity Support Agreement and for Total S.A.’s commitments set forth in such agreement, we issued to Total a warrant (the “Upfront Warrant”) that is exercisable to purchase 9,531,677 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.8685 per share, subject to adjustment for customary anti-dilution and other events. The Upfront Warrant is exercisable at any time for seven years after its issuance, provided that, so long as at least $25 million of our existing convertible debt remains outstanding, such exercise will not cause “any person,” including Total S.A., to, directly or indirectly, including through one or more wholly-owned subsidiaries, become the “beneficial owner” (as such terms are defined in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), of more than 74.99% of the voting power of our common stock at such time, because “any person” becoming such “beneficial owner” would trigger the repurchase or conversion of our existing convertible debt.

The Tender Offer Agreement, Tender Offer Agreement Guaranty, Credit Support Agreement, Affiliation Agreement, Affiliation Agreement Guaranty, Research and Collaboration Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement, Rights Agreement Amendment, Second Rights Agreement Amendment and By-Law amendments, and amendments thereto, as described above are attached to, and more fully described in, our Form 8-Ks as filed with the SEC on May 2, 2011, June 7, 2011, June 15, 2011 and December 23, 2011, our Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Form 14D-9 filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011, and our Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on November 2, 2012. The Tenesol Stock Purchase Agreement, the Private Placement Agreement and the Master Agreement are attached to, and more fully described in, our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 23, 2011 and Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed with the SEC on January 3, 2012.

Sale of 0.75% Debentures Due 2018

In May 2013, we issued $300 million in aggregate principal amount of our 0.75% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2018 (the “2018 Debentures”) in a private offering. $200 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Debentures were sold to Total by the initial purchasers of the 2018 Debentures. The 2018 Debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time based on an initial conversion rate of 40.0871 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2018 Debentures (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $24.95 per share of our common stock), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The holders of the 2018 Debentures may require us to repurchase their 2018 Debentures under certain circumstances. The 2018 Debentures are subject to redemption at our option under certain circumstances.

Sale of 0.875% Debentures Due 2021

In June 2014, we issued $400 million in aggregate principal amount of our 0.875% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2021 (the “2021 Debentures”) in a private offering. $250 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Debentures were sold to Total by the initial purchasers of the 2021 Debentures. The 2021 Debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time based on an initial conversion rate of 20.5071 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2021 Debentures (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $48.76 per share of our common stock), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The holders of the 2021 Debentures may require us to repurchase their 2021 Debentures under certain circumstances. The 2021 Debentures are subject to redemption at our option under certain circumstances.

Sale of 4.00% Debentures Due 2023

In December 2015, we issued $425 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2023 (the “2023 Debentures”) in a private offering. $100 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Debentures were sold to Total by the initial purchasers of the 2023 Debentures. The 2023 Debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time based on an initial conversion rate of 32.7568 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2023 Debentures (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $30.53 per share of our common stock), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The holders of the 2023 Debentures may require us to repurchase their 2023 Debentures under certain circumstances. The 2023 Debentures are subject to redemption at our option under certain circumstances.

Project Co-Development Agreements

In the ordinary course of our business, from time to time we enter into agreements with Total or its affiliates in connection with certain of our international project co-development initiatives, including master services agreements.whereby SunPower and Total split the associated costs evenly. In fiscal 2015, Total incurred $0.5 million2016, such total project co-development costs were approximately $3.4 million.

During fiscal 2016, in fees payable toconnection with a co-development project between us and Total, we incurred $0.7made a $7.0 million in fees payablepayment to Total under these agreements.in exchange for Total’s ownership interest in the co-development project.

We have entered into an agreement to sell to Total one of our international power plant assets, with such sale expected to close in Q1 2017. We expect to receive from Total approximately $0.4 million for our 50% equity stake in the asset. In addition, in connection with the project, we anticipate receiving from the project company to be wholly-owned by Total (i) a development fee of approximately $1.8 million and (ii) a purchase price of approximately $24.0 million for solar modules being sold for use on the project.

EPC, O&M Services and Components Agreements

In the ordinary course of our business, from time to time we enter into various engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) services, operations and maintenance services (“O&M services”) and component sales agreements relating to solar projects, including EPC services, O&M services and component sales agreements relating to projects owned or partially owned by Total or its affiliates. On November 9, 2016, we and Total executed a four-year, up to 200-MW supply agreement to support the solarization of Total facilities around the world. This agreement, which was amended and restated in March 2017 with changes not material to the Company, covers the supply of 150 MW of E-series panels with an option to purchase up to another 50 MW of P-Series panels, and includes a Q1 2017 pre-payment in the amount of approximately $90 million. In fiscal 2015,2016, we received an aggregate of approximately $56.8$64.7 million from Total and its affiliates under EPC services, O&M services and component sales agreements in respect of projects in which Total has a direct or indirect material interest.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors serves as the representative of the Board of Directors with respect to its oversight of:

The Audit Committee also reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, in the annual audit of financial statements and in assignments unrelated to the audit, and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees.

The Audit Committee provides the Board such information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of financial matters requiring the attention of the Board. The Audit Committee reviews our financial disclosures, and meets privately, outside the presence of our management, with our independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 3, 20161, 2017 with management, including a discussion of the quality and substance of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made in connection with the audited financial statements, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee reports on these meetings to our Board of Directors.

Our management has primary responsibility for preparing our financial statements and for our financial reporting process. In addition, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles, and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reports as follows:

(1) The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 20152016 with our management.

(2) The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16,1301, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

(3) The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence, including whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of non-audit services to us is compatible with its independence.

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services, and other services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committee (or its Chair pursuant to delegated authority) of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that fiscal year, the Audit Committee (or its Chair pursuant to delegated authority) must approve the specific service before the independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to perform such services for us.

Based on the review and discussion referred to in items (1) through (3) above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors, and the Board approved, the inclusion of our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016,1, 2017, as filed with the SEC.

The foregoing report was submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A promulgated by the SEC or Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors for fiscal 2015.2016. The table does not include Mr. Werner, who did not receive separate compensation for his service on the Board.

20152016 Director Compensation Table

20152016 Compensation Features.Our compensation programs are intended to align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance that meets or exceeds the goals that the Compensation Committee establishes with the objective of increasing stockholder value. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the compensation programs for our named executive officers to ensure they achieve the desired goals of aligning our executive compensation structure with our stockholders’ interests and current market practices. Among the program features incorporated by the Compensation Committee in fiscal 20152016 to implement the executive compensation philosophy stated above are the following:

Our financial and operational performance was the key factor in the compensation decisions and outcomes for fiscal 2015,2016, as further described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation.” One of the core tenets of our executive compensation philosophy is our emphasis on performance pay. As highlighted in the Compensation Components chart in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in fiscal 2015,2016, a large portion of our named executive officers’ target compensation (79%(93% for our Chief Executive Officer and averaging 77%78% for our other named executive officers) consisted of annual and semi-annual incentive bonus programs and long-term equity incentives.

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation programs, executive officer pay levels, and individual pay actions approved for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are directly aligned with our executive compensation philosophy and fully support its goals. Performance with respect to our revenue profitability and free cash flow metric targetstarget exceeded

the minimum trigger but fell short of target performance levels in fiscal 2015,2016, and performance with respect to our EBITDA metric target fell short of the minimum trigger, which, combined, resulted in performance-based restricted stock awards being earned at approximately 118%28% of the target level. Our corporate performance in fiscal 20152016 also resulted in aggregate cash bonus awards under our performance-based cash bonus programs abovebelow the target level. We are asking our stockholders to

indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific compensation item, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, the Board recommends that our stockholders vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that, on an advisory basis, the compensation of SunPower’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narratives and descriptions in SunPower’s proxy statement for the Annual Meeting, is hereby APPROVED.”

Vote Required

The non-binding advisory vote on named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our stock having voting power and in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. “Broker non-votes” have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against this proposal.

Although the say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on us, the Compensation Committee or our Board, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we expect to consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee expects to evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

Next Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officers’ Compensation

In a non-binding advisory vote at our 2011 Annual Meeting, our stockholders recommended that a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of SunPower’s named executive officers be presented to stockholders for their consideration every year. In light of the result of this vote, our Board determined to implement a non-binding advisory stockholder vote on named executive officers’ compensation once every year. Therefore, the next non-binding advisory stockholder vote on named executive officers’ compensation is expected to occur at the 2017 annual stockholders meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SEC ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS.

PROPOSAL THREE

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act also requires us to ask our stockholders to vote, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, at the Annual Meeting on how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. In voting on this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation every one, two, or three years.

While we will continue to monitor developments in this area, our Board believes that an advisory vote to approve executive compensation every year is appropriate. This will enable our stockholders to vote, on an advisory basis, on the most recent executive compensation information that is presented in our proxy statement, leading to a more meaningful and coherent communication between us and our stockholders on the executive compensation of our named executive officers.

Based on the factors discussed, our Board recommends that future advisory votes to approve executive compensation occur every year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes to approve executive compensation. Stockholders are not being asked to approve or disapprove our Board’s recommendation, but rather to indicate their choice among the following frequency options: one year, two years or three years, or to abstain from voting.

Vote Required

The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by holders of our stock having voting power and in attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation that has been recommended by our stockholders. Neither “broker non-votes” nor abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for this proposal.

Although the frequency of say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on us, the Compensation Committee or our Board, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against our proposed frequency, we expect to consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee expects to evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EVERY YEAR AS THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH OUR STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE PROVIDED FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SEC ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CertainBiographical information as of March 17, 2016, regarding each offor our executive officers, other than Mr. Werner, is set forthlisted below. Biographical information for Mr. Werner, who is both a director and an executive officer of the Company, can be found in the section entitled “Proposal One—Re-election of Class III Directors”.

Mr. Thomas H. Werner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2010, a member of our Board since June 2003, and Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 2011. From June 2003 to April 2010, Mr. Werner served as our Chief Executive Officer. Before joining SunPower, from 2001 to 2003, he held the position of Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Light Machines, Inc., an optical solutions subsidiary of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Werner was Vice President and General Manager of the Business Connectivity Group of 3Com Corp., a network solutions company. He has also held a number of executive management positions at Oak Industries, Inc. and General Electric Co., and currently serves as a board member of Cree, Inc., Silver Spring Networks, and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. Mr. Werner is on the Board of Trustees of Marquette University. Mr. Werner holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Marquette University, and a master’s degree in business administration from George Washington University.

Mr. Charles D. Boynton has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer since October 2016. From March 2012 to October 2016, Mr. Boynton served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2012.Officer. In March 2012, Mr. Boynton also served as our Acting Financial Officer. From June 2010 to March 2012, he served as our Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development, where he drove strategic investments, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, field finance and finance, planning and analysis. Before joining SunPower in June 2010, Mr. Boynton was the Chief Financial Officer for ServiceSource, LLC from April 2008 to June 2010. From March 2004 to April 2008 he served as the Chief Financial Officer at Intelliden. Earlier in his career, Mr. Boynton held key financial positions at Commerce One, Inc., Kraft Foods, Inc. and Grant Thornton, LLP. He is a member of the board of trustees of the San Jose Technology Museum of Innovation and has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of 8Point3 Energy Partners LP since June 2015. Mr. Boynton was a certified public accountant, State of Illinois, and a Member FEI, Silicon Valley Chapter. Mr. Boynton earned his master’s degree in business administration at Northwestern University and his Bachelor of Science degree in business from Indiana University.

Mr. HowardKenneth J. WengerMahaffey has served as our Executive Vice President, Business UnitsGeneral Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2014. From November 2011 to October 2014,2016. Mr. WengerMahaffey previously served as our Vice President, Regions. From January 2010 to October 2011, Mr. Wenger served as President, Utilities and Power Plants. From August 2008 to January 2010, Mr. Wenger served as President,General Counsel, Global Business Units and led all of our business units sincefrom January 2007 as an executive officer of the Company.to October 2016. From 2003September 2006 to January 2007, Mr. Wengerhe served as Executive Vice President and a member of the board of directorsAssociate General Counsel of PowerLight Corporation, a solar system integration company that we acquired in January 2007 and subsequently renamed SunPower Corporation, Systems withSystems. Before PowerLight, Mr. Wenger serving as President. From 2000Mahaffey was in private practice from 1995 to 2003,2006. Mr. Wenger was Vice President, North American Business of AstroPower Inc., a solar power manufacturer and system provider acquired by General Electric, and from 1998 to 2000 he was the Director, Grid-Connected Business. From 1993 to 1998, Mr. Wenger co-founded and managed Pacific Energy Group, a solar power consulting firm and, from 1989 to 1993, Mr. Wenger worked for the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, a utility company in northern California, in both research and strategic planning of solar and distributed generation assets. Mr. Wenger holdsMahaffey has a Bachelor of Arts degree in environmental studies from the University of California, Santa Barbara,San Diego, and a MasterJuris Doctor degree from McGeorge School of Science degree in engineering from theLaw, University of Colorado, Boulder.the Pacific.

Mr. Marty T. Neese has served as our Chief Operating Officer since June 2008. From October 2007 to June 2008, Mr. Neese served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations of Flextronics International Ltd., a manufacturing services company. From September 2004 to October 2007, Mr. Neese served in a variety of senior management positions at Solectron Corporation, a manufacturing services company, most recently as its Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations. Mr. Neese also served in the U.S. Army for five years, reaching the rank of Captain. He is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his master’s degree in business administration from the University of Florida.

Ms. Lisa BodensteinerDr. Bill Mulligan has served as our Executive Vice President, General CounselGlobal Operations since February 2017, responsible for leading our global operations and Corporate Secretary since June 2012. From October 2009 to June 2012, Ms. Bodensteiner servedworldwide materials sourcing. Dr. Mulligan originally joined SunPower in roles with increasing responsibility,1998 and most recently as General Counsel, Project Development at First Solar Inc. From October 2007 to April 2009, Ms. Bodensteiner servedworked for more than 12 years as Vice President of research and General Counseldevelopment, where he led the development of our PV cell technology and the world’s highest efficiency commercial solar panel. He left SunPower in 2010, but returned four years later with our acquisition of SolarBridge, where he was serving as President and CEO. Most recently he was SunPower’s Vice President Upstream Strategy. Dr. Mulligan has more than 30 years of solar and microelectronics industry experience, and prior to SunPower served in various engineering and management positions at OptiSolarJX Crystals, Inc., a privately held, vertically integrated solar energy producer, manufacturer of proprietary thin-film photovoltaic solar panelsthe National Renewable Energy Laboratory, AstroPower, and developer of utility-scale solar farms. Before OptiSolar, Ms. Bodensteiner had more than a decade of experience at Calpine Corporation, servingFairchild/ National Semiconductor. Dr. Mulligan received dual undergraduate degrees in various legal roles including as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretarychemistry and Chief Compliance Officer. From 1989 to 1996, Ms. Bodensteiner practiced as a transactional attorney at law firms. Ms. Bodensteiner earned a Bachelor of Science degree in business administrationhistory from the University of Nevada, Reno,Washington, a master’s of science in chemical engineering from the University of Michigan and a J.D.his doctorate in materials science from Santa Clara University.the Colorado School of Mines. He holds 10 patents and is the author of more than 30 publications related to solar energy.

Mr. Douglas J. Richards has served as our Executive Vice President, Administration since November 2011. From April 2010 to October 2011, Mr. Richards served as our Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Services. From September 2007 to March 2010, Mr. Richards served as our Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Services. From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Richards was Vice President of Human Resources and Administration for SelectBuild, a construction services company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of BMHC, and from 2000 to 2006, Mr. Richards was Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Administration for BlueArc, a provider of high performance unified network storage systems to enterprise markets. Before BlueArc, Mr. Richards spent 10 years at Compaq Computer Corporation and five years at Apple Computer, Inc. in various management positions. Mr. Richards graduated from California State University, Chico, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in public administration.

Mr. Eric Branderiz has served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2012, was Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from September 2011 to July 2012 and was Vice President and Corporate Controller from June 2010 to August 2011. Concurrent with his other responsibilities, as of March 2016, Mr. Branderiz is also Senior Vice President, Head of Corporate Tax, and served as Senior Vice President, Head of Corporate Financial Planning & Analysis from June 2015 to March 2016 and as Senior Vice President, Global RLC Operations and Finance from March 2013 to September 2014. Mr. Branderiz was the Vice President, Corporate Controller, Treasurer, and Head of Subsidy Business Operations for the Knowledge Universe (KU) from May 2009 to May 2010. Before KU, he served in various positions at Spansion, Inc. from June 2003 to April 2009, including as the Corporate Vice President, Corporate Finance & Corporate Controller. Before Spansion’s initial public offering, Mr. Branderiz served in several concurrent capacities as Corporate Controller, Head of Corporate Financial Planning & Analysis, Head of Regional Sales & Marketing Finance, and Internal Controls. Before Spansion, Mr. Branderiz held various positions at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., including Americas Regional Controller; he also held positions at Ernst & Young, LLP, and the Provincial Branch of Consumer & Corporate Affairs, Alberta Securities Commission and Treasury Departments in Canada. He is a California licensed Certified Public Accountant and earned a Business Commerce degree from the University of Alberta, Canada.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a detailed review and analysis of our compensation policies and programs that applied to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016.1, 2017. Our named executive officers, as set forth in the following table, were our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and the next three most highly-compensatedhighly- compensated executive officers serving as of January 3, 2016.1, 2017.

(1) Mr. Wenger’s employment terminated on March 3, 2017.

(2) Mr. Neese’s employment terminated on February 10, 2017.

Executive Summary

Our compensation programs are intended to align our named executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance that meets or exceeds the goals that the Compensation Committee establishes with the ultimate objective of increasing stockholder value. We have adopted an executive compensation philosophy designed to deliver competitive total compensation upon the achievement of financial and strategic performance objectives. The total compensation received by our named executive officers varies based on corporate and individual performance, as measured against performance goals. Therefore, a significant portion of each named executive officer’s total pay is tied to Company performance (see the “20152016 Compensation Components” chart below).

We delivered strongIn fiscal 2016 we faced significant market challenges, which impacted our margins and prompted us to implement changes to our business in order to realign our downstream investments, optimize our supply chain, and reduce operating expenses. This impacted our financial and operational results for fiscal 2015:2016:

For fiscal 2015,2016, our financial performance wasand the difficult market environment we faced were the key factorfactors in the compensation decisions and outcomes for the year. In fiscal 2015,2016, the highlights of our named executive officer compensation program were as follows:

of fiscal 2016. Mr. Werner also communicated his intention to decline any bonus earned for fiscal 2016 pursuant to our performance-based cash bonus programs (specifically, the 2016 Annual Bonus Program and the Executive Semi- Annual Plan).

In fiscal 2015,2016, a significant majority of our named executive officers’ target compensation (89%(93% for our Chief Executive Officer, before taking into account his salary reduction and decline of bonus payout, and averaging 77%78% for our other named executive officers) consisted of semi-annual and annual bonus programs and long-term equity incentives.

At our 20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders voted to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for that meeting. We refer to this vote as our Say-on-Pay vote. Our Compensation Committee considered the results of the Say-on-Pay vote (which received 99%98% approval of the votes cast) at its meetings after the Say-on-Pay vote when it set annual executive compensation. After our Compensation Committee reviewed the stockholders’ approval of the Say-on-Pay vote in 2015,2016, our Compensation Committee decided to maintain the general framework of our fiscal 20142015 compensation policies and programs for our named executive officers in fiscal 20152016, with certain modifications, as it believed such programs continued to be in the best interest of our stockholders.

The following discussion should be read together with the information we present in the compensation tables, the footnotes and narratives to those tables and the related disclosure appearing in “Executive Compensation” below.

General Philosophy and Objectives

In fiscal 2015,2016, we continued to operate a compensation program designed primarily to reward our named executive officers for outstandingbased on our financial performance and the achievement of corporate objectives consistent with increasing long-term stockholder value. Our compensation program continued to be based on the following principal goals:

In order to implement our philosophy, the Compensation Committee has a disciplined process for adopting executive compensation programs and individual executive officer pay actions that includes the analysis of competitive market data, a review of each executive officer’s role, performance assessments, and consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as described below.

The Compensation Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that rewards the achievement of specific corporate and financial goals, by rewarding our named executive officers when those goals are met or exceeded, with the ultimate objective of increasing stockholder value. In addition, we believe the mix of base salary, performance-based cash awards, and time-based and performance-based equity awards provides proper incentives without encouraging excessive risk taking. We believe that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

Compensation Setting Process

The Compensation Committee is responsible for managing the compensation of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, in a manner consistent with our compensation philosophy. In accordance with the “controlled company” exception under the applicable listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, our Compensation Committee is composed of two independent directors and two directors designated by our controlling stockholder, Total. We also have a Section 16/162(m) Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee consisting solely of independent directors available to approve certain compensation matters in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code and Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, as recommended by the Compensation Committee.Act. The Compensation Committee establishes our compensation philosophy and objectives and annually reviews and, as necessary and appropriate, adjusts each named executive officer’s compensation. Consistent with its philosophy, the Compensation Committee offered our named executive officers total target compensation opportunities ranging from the 50^th50th percentile to the 75^th75th percentile of our peer group of companies (as further described below) during fiscal 2015.2016. When determining appropriate compensation for the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered the advice of an independent compensation consultant, recommendations from management and internal compensation specialists, practices of companies within our peer group, our performance, our business plan and individual performance. As part of this process, the compensation consultant prepared a competitive analysis of our compensation program, and management presented

its recommendations regarding base salary, time- and performance-based equity awards and performance targets under our 20152016 Annual Bonus Program and Executive Semi-Annual Bonus

Plan to the Compensation Committee for its review and consideration. The Compensation Committee accepts, rejects, or accepts as modified, management’s various recommendations regarding compensation for the named executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also approves, after modification, management’s recommendations on various performance targets and milestones. The Compensation Committee met without our Chief Executive Officer when reviewing and establishing his compensation.

Compensation Consultant and Peer Group

In fiscal 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee again directly engaged and retained Radford, a compensation consulting firm and a business unit of Aon Hewitt, to identify and maintain a list of our peer group of companies. The Compensation Committee selected Radford on the basis of its experience and familiarity with the technology industry. The Compensation Committee established the peer group used in connection with fiscal 20152016 compensation decisions consistent with the Compensation Committee’s belief that the peer group should closely match our business, and be based on our historical and anticipated growth. In comparison to our peer group used for purposes of setting fiscal 20142015 compensation, our peer group in fiscal 2015 remained unchanged.2016 was updated to remove three companies, Energizer Holdings, Inc., International Rectifier and Roper Industries, Inc. and to add seven companies, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., ARRIS Group, Inc., Belden Inc., Lam Research Corporation, Marvell Technology Group Ltd., NVIDIA Corporation and SolarCity Corporation. The peer group was selected using a mix of the following factors:

The Compensation Committee believes the characteristics of our fiscal 20152016 peer group closely match those of our core business. The companies included in our peer group for purposes of establishing fiscal 20152016 compensation are listed below:

Radford provided the Compensation Committee with competitive market information on the peer companies, as well as aggregated data on the broader technology market with respect to base salaries, cash bonus awards as a percentage of base salaries, total cash compensation, equity awards, and equity awards.total direct compensation. In fiscal 2015,2016, Radford also advised the Compensation Committee in connection with evaluating our compensation practices, developing and implementing our executive compensation program and philosophy, establishing total compensation targets, and setting specific compensation components to reach the determined total compensation targets. We also participated in the Radford Global Technology Survey. Radford did not provide any services to us other than advising the Compensation Committee and us, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, on executive compensation issues. We haveThe Compensation Committee has considered and assessed all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Exchange Act, that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to the compensation consultant described above. Based on this review, we are not aware of anythe Compensation Committee determined that no material conflict of interest that has been raised by the work performed by Radford.

Benchmarking

In making its compensation decisions for our named executive officers for fiscal 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee benchmarked each named executive officer’s total compensation to the compensation of individuals in comparative positions at companies in the peer group based on information that management obtained from public filings, supplemented by data Radford provided from surveys. In general, the Compensation Committee initially established base salaries at the 50^th percentile of the peer group and both performance-based cash bonus awards and long-term time- and performance-based equity awards generally above the 50^thpercentile of the peer group. In establishing incentive opportunities, the Compensation Committee focused on corporate performance so that if our corporate performance was achieved at target levels, the Compensation Committee expected that our named executive officers’ total pay would be between the 50^th percentile of the peer group and the 75^th percentile of the peer group. The Compensation Committee viewed benchmarking as just the beginning, and not the end, of its discussion regarding our named executive officers’ pay opportunities for fiscal 2015,2016, and looked to individual performance, the named executive officer’s experience in the executive role, and the executive’s scope of responsibility being narrower or broader than that of comparable positions at our peer group companies to establish final pay opportunities either above or below the initial benchmarks.

The Compensation Committee believes that consideration of such factors, among others, strongly links our named executive officers’ pay to their individual and our corporate performance, and best aligns our named executive officers’ compensation interests with the interests of our stockholders.

20152016 Compensation Components

For fiscal 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee allocated total compensation among various pay elements consisting of base salary, performance-based cash bonus awards, time-based equity awards, performance-based equity awards, and perquisites and other compensation. The table below provides an overview of each element of compensation and is followed by a further discussion and analysis of the specific decisions that we made for each element for fiscal 2015:2016:

The relative proportion of each element for fiscal 20152016, as set forth below, was based generally on the Compensation Committee’s comparison of compensation that we offered our named executive officers against compensation offered by peer group companies to their named executive officers, the tax and accounting consequences of certain types of equity compensation, and a desire to allocate a higher proportion of total compensation to performance-based and equity incentive awards.

The components of compensation for the named executive officers for fiscal 2015 are set forth below. This composition is consistent with our philosophy of aligning our named executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders by tying a significant portion of their total compensation to corporate performance goals and providing long-term incentives in the form of equity awards.

2016 Compensation Components

2015 Compensation Components

Analysis of Fiscal 20152016 Compensation Decisions

Base Salary. For fiscal 2015, Messrs.2016, only Mr. Boynton Wenger, and Richards each received an increase in base salary after we evaluated competitive marketto bring his base salary closer to the compensation paid by companies in our competitive peer group for similar positions. We believe thatThe Compensation Committee chose not to adjust the base salaries forof our other named executive officers should be initially targeted atafter determining the 50^th percentilelevels were consistent with market practices and reflective of the range of salaries for executive officers in similar positionstheir roles, skill sets, and with similar responsibilities at comparable companies. Ourperformance. In August 2016, we reduced our Chief Executive Officer’s base salary is targeted belowto $1, net of benefit costs, at his request, in recognition of the 50^th percentile,difficulties faced by our company in the remainder of 2016 and as we believe that his compensation should be more closely aligned withpart of our overall performance. This initial benchmarking is consistent withcost cutting measures implemented in our overall compensation philosophy, a significant component of which is to help us best attract, retain and equitably reward our executives.third quarter.

The table below sets forth the salaries in effect in fiscal 20152016 compared with the salaries in effect in fiscal 20142015 for each of our named executive officers:

Our Compensation Committee approves the salary for each of our named executive officers. For those named executive officers below the Chief Executive Officer level, our Compensation Committee generally takes into account the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations. In fiscal 2015, our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations concerning the base salaries of the other named executive officers were approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries annually, and adjusts base salaries from time to time to align salaries with market levels, based on the information provided by Radford and after taking into account an individual’s prior performance, experience, importance of position and expected future performance. Based on information presented to our Compensation Committee by Radford regarding market ranges for salaries at peer group companies, we determined that our named executive officers’ 2014 base salaries were generally at approximately the 50^th percentile of our peer group of companies. The Compensation Committee also considered the named executive officer’s experience in the executive role or the executive’s scope of responsibility compared to that of comparable positions at our peer group companies.

Performance-Based Cash Bonus Awards. As in the prior fiscal year, we maintained two performance-based cash bonus programs during fiscal 20152016 in order to link bonus payments both to corporate financial goals and operational objectives and to individual performance, as determined by each executive’s manager (or, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, by the Board of Directors).performance. The first program was our Annual Executive Bonus Plan, under which we adopted the 20152016 Annual Bonus Program. The second program was our Executive Semi-Annual Incentive Bonus Plan which replaces our former Executive Quarterly Key Initiative Bonus Plan, and which we refer to(referenced as our Semi-Annual Bonus Plan. The Semi-Annual Bonus Plan is effective semi-annually on an ongoing basis.Plan).

Because we generally set base salaries for our executive officers at the 50^th percentile of the range of salaries for executive officers in similar positions and with similar responsibilities at comparable companies, we rely on performance-based cash bonus awards to elevate target total cash compensation to between the 50^th percentile and the 75^th percentile. In fiscal 2015,2016, target cash compensation (base salary plus target bonus opportunityopportunity) was set between the 50^th and 75^th percentile for each named executive officer, except for Mr. Neese, and our Chief Executive Officer, whose target bonus opportunities wereopportunity was set above the 75^thpercentile through our benchmarking process, andto achieve the desired position of total target cash compensation. We believe that performance-based cash bonus awards, and target total cash compensation should be closely aligned with our overall performance, and higher target bonus opportunities promote a variable, performance-oriented total compensation philosophy.

In fiscal 2015,2016, we allocated three-quarters75% of each named executive officer’s aggregate annual target cash bonus awards under the 20152016 Annual Bonus Program and one-quarter25% under the Executive Semi-Annual Bonus Plan. Our Compensation Committee chose this allocation in orderPlan, to further our goal of tyingtie a significant proportion of our named executive officers’ incentive compensation to our full fiscal year operating and financial results. Our Compensation Committee approved the individual bonus program incentive level for our Chief Executive Officer and for each named executive officer below the Chief Executive Officer level. The table below summarizes the total target payout levels for each named executive officer in each of fiscal 20142015 and fiscal 2015,2016, as well as the target payout levels under the 20152016 Annual Bonus Program and the Executive Semi-Annual Bonus Plan (for fiscal 2015)2016), expressed as a percentage of annual base salary. For 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee maintained target payout levels under these programs as aat the same percentage of annual salary for each of our named executive officers, after it evaluated competitivethe market compensation paid by companies in our peer group for similar positions,data, individual performance, and the scope of the named executive officer roles.

Actual bonus payments for each named executive officer under both the 20152016 Annual Bonus Program and the Semi-Annual Bonus Plan are formula-driven, and the formulas are used to calculate actual bonus payments. See “Executive Compensation—Non-EquityNon- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” below for more information about these formulas.

Payments to our named executive officersIn fiscal 2016, we replaced the pre-tax net income metric (previously used under our 2015 Annual Bonus Program) with an adjusted EBITDA metric, which we believed to be more reflective of the results of our operations, removed the cash flow metric to simplify and avoid unintended results, and lowered the minimum payout to 50% (from 80% in fiscal 2015). Our 2016 Annual Bonus Program required the achievement of corporate targets established in respect of our: annual revenue metric (33%(50% of payment), annual profitability and EBITDA metric (33% of payment), and annual free cash flow metric (33%(50% of payment). Please see “Executive Compensation—Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” for information on how we calculated revenue and EBITDA. The targets were set by the Compensation Committee based on the operating plan approved by our Board at the beginning of fiscal 2015.2016. The operating plan was based on our history of growth and expectations regarding our future growth, as well as potential challenges in achieving such growth. The performance targets were established at a level that the Compensation Committee determined to be challenging for our named executive officers to achieve. In fiscal 2015,2016, we achieved 113%a 57.4% payout factor in respect of the annual revenue target 150%and a 0% payout factor in respect of the annual profitability target, and in excess of 150% of the annual free cash flow target, and the Compensation Committee utilized its negative discretion to adjust attainment to 80% of the annual free cash flow target; therefore, our named executive officers earned bonus amounts for all portions of the 2015 Annual Bonus Program. SuchEBITDA target. Earned bonus amounts are reflected in the “20152016 Total Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”Compensation” table below.

Payments to our named executive officers under our Semi-Annual Bonus Plan required the achievement of corporate targets set in respect of our semi-annual profitability metric and quarterly corporate milestones, as modified by an individual modifier assigned by each named executive officer’s managerthe Chief Executive Officer (or, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, by the Board of Directors) based on his or her individual performance. Such individual modifiers are expressed as a percentage, capped at 125%, and are combined with a Company milestone factor and the level of achievement of our corporate targets, to calculate bonus payments under the plan.

Example Calculation:

We incorporate a “management by objective” system throughout our organization to establish performance goals that supplement our financial goals. Management establishes five-year corporate milestones, and then derives from them annual and quarterly corporate milestones. Each milestone is reviewed, revised and approved by our Board of Directors, and subsequently the scores are reviewed and approved by our Board.Compensation Committee. In addition, for fiscal 2015,2016, each named executive officer, other than our Chief Executive Officer, established quarterly personal Key Initiatives which were approved by the Chief Executive Officer and were in line with each quarter’s corporate milestones. Quarterly corporate milestones in fiscal 20152016 included sensitive business objectives applicable to our entire company, focusing on confidential cost targets, major customer transactions, new product development, manufacturing plans, process enhancements, and inventory turns. For fiscal 2015,2016, personal Key Initiative objectives included executing on confidential cost and revenue targets, achieving liquidity objectives, product development, market expansion, manufacturing and process efficiencies, among others. The Board determined the Chief Executive Officer’s Key Initiatives, which consisted solely of the quarterly corporate milestones that our Board approvedselected after discussion with the Chief Executive Officer. These corporate milestones and personal objectives are typically challenging in nature and designed to encourage the individual to achieve success in his position during the performance period. In fiscal 2013, we achieved an average of 83% of our corporate milestones and an average of 85%At the end of the personal Key Initiativesyear, the Compensation Committee determines the Chief Executive Officer’s individual modifier, and the Chief Executive Officer determines the individual modifier for our 2013each other named executive officers. Inofficer, based on achievement of their respective Key Initiatives. As reference points, in fiscal 2014, we achieved an average of 83% of our corporate milestones and an average of 80% of the personal Key Initiatives for our 2014 named executive officers. InInitiatives; in fiscal 2015, we achieved an average of 74% of our corporate milestones, and the average individual modifier assigned to our named executive officers was 92%.

In fiscal 2015, the thresholds in respect2016, we achieved an average of 70.4% of our semi-annual profitability metric under our Semi-Annual Bonus Plan were exceededcorporate milestones, and achieved at the maximum level. The threshold performance for these quarterly corporate milestone scores was achieved in four quarters of fiscal 2015. Actual payments were determined based on each named executive officer’saverage individual modifier. Bonus amounts paidmodifier assigned to our named executive officers in fiscal 2015 are reflected in the following table:was 80%.

2015 Total Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

However, in August 2016, management recommended, in light of our financial situation and to promote management’s focus on cost reduction and cash preservation, that the Compensation Committee adopt an additional “cash trigger”, based on our ending cash for fiscal 2016, equal to the amount reported in our consolidated balance sheet as of the fiscal year end for the line item “Cash and cash equivalents”.

Example Calculation (With Cash Trigger):

In fiscal 2016, we did not meet the cash trigger, and therefore no amounts were paid to our executive officers under the Semi-Annual Bonus Plan.

Equity Awards.Our Compensation Committee believes that long-term company performance is best achieved by anownership culture that encourages long-term performance by our executive officers through the use of equity-based awards. Our SunPower Corporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or 2015 Equity Plan, permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciationrights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. Consistent with our goal to attract, retain and reward the best available talent, and in light of our setting our total direct compensation above the 50^th percentile of our peer group, we targeted long-term equity awards generally approximating the 75^th percentile of our peer group. In fiscal 2015,2016, our long-term equity awards ranged from below the 50^th percentile to the 75^th percentile of our peer group. Our Chief Executive Officer’slong-term equity awards were between the 2550^th and 5075^th percentile in order to align more of his at-risk compensation with stockholder returns.returns and to promote long-term retention. Ourother named executive officers’ long-term equity awards were above the 50^th50th percentile if the scope of their responsibilities was significantly broader than that of executives in similar positions at peer companies.

The Compensation Committee then allocated long-term equity awards between time-based and performance-basedrestricted stock units. We believe that time-based restricted stock units provide a more effective retention tool while performance-basedperformance- based restricted stock units provide a stronger performance driver. To balance the advantages of both time-based and performance-based awards, the Compensation Committee decided that annual long-term equity incentive awards granted to Mr. Boynton andMr. Richardsour named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer in fiscal 20152016 would be made half in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (which could be earned in amounts between 0% and 150% of the target amount) and half in the form of time-based restricted stock units, all of which would vest over threefour years.

The Compensation Committee also approved a special recognitiondecided to grant for Mr. Boynton of 7,500an additional restricted stock units, which will vest over three years,unit award to Mr. Neese in fiscal 2016 in recognition for his role in closingof record fab performance during the 8point3 transaction.

previous fiscal year, to vest annually over two years (subject to Mr. Neese’s continued employment. The Compensation Committee decided that annual long-term equity incentive awards granted to Mr. NeeseWerner in fiscal 20152016 would be made 25%50% in the form of time-based restricted stock units, all of which would vest over three years, and 75% in theform of performance-based restricted stock units (which could be earned in amounts between 0% and 150% of the target amount). The Compensation Committee decided that annual long-term equity incentive awards granted to Mr. Wenger in fiscal 2015 wouldbe made 37% in the form of time-based restricted stock units, all of which would vest over three years, and 63%50% in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (which could be earned in amounts between 0% and 150% of the target amount). TheCompensation Committee decided that annual long-term equity incentive awards granted to Mr. Werner in fiscal 2015 would be made 35% in the form of time-based restricted stock units,, all of which would vest over three years, and 65% inyears. In addition to these annual awards, the form ofCompensation Committee decided to grant an additional 40,000 performance-based restricted stock units (which could be earned in amounts between 0% and 150% of the target amount). to Mr. Werner, to be earned based on the achievement of performance goals tied to our 2016 Annual Bonus Program and our Semi-Annual Bonus Plan, all of which would vest on March 31, 2020, as additional incentive for performance, and as a long-term retention measure. The Compensation Committee also approved an RSUa one-time grant forto Mr. Werner of 125,178an additional 120,000 restricted stock units, all of which would vest on September 1, 2016, in replacement of certain awards granted in 2012 and 2013 that were rescinded (see footnote 1 below).March 31, 2020, also as a long-term retention measure.

Awards granted and earned in fiscal 20152016 were as follows:

Performance-based restricted stock units were used as incentive compensation during fiscal 20152016 to align our namedexecutive officers’ compensation with corporate performance. In connection with our annual review of executive officer compensation,the Compensation Committee approved performance targets in respect of our: annual revenue metric (33%(50% of the award), annualprofitability metric (33% of the award), and annual free cash flowEBITDA metric (33%(50% of the award), and a formula under which actualawards would be calculated after completion of the 20152016 fiscal year. In addition, other performance targets were approved in respectof specific cost, new business development, and profit metrics, and a formula under which actual awards would be calculatedafter completion of the 2015 fiscal year (and after completion of the 2016 fiscal year with respect to 33,400 performance-basedrestricted stock units granted to Mr. Werner). See “Executive Compensation—Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” below for more information about these metrics, targets, and formulas.

These performance metrics were selected on the basis of the operating plan approved by our Board after considering ourhistory of growth and expectations regarding our future growth, as well as potential challenges in achieving such growth. The performance targets were established at a level that the Compensation Committee determined to be challenging for our namedexecutive officers to achieve. In fiscal 2015,2016, our named executive officers achieved 113%a 57.4% payout factor in respect of the annual

revenue metric target 150%and a 0% payout factor in respect of the annual profitability metric target and 90% of the annual free cash flowEBITDA metric target. The performance-based restricted stock units earned by our named executive officers began vesting in threefour equal annual installments, subject to continued service, startingMarch 1, 2016.2017.

In addition, we targeted strategic objectives in granting other performance-basedFor fiscal 2016, our Compensation Committee continued to grant time-based restricted stock units during 2015 toeach of Mr. Werner, Mr. Wenger, and Mr. Neese. These awards were only earned if each individual achieved specific performancetargets setthat vest in respect of metrics tied to such individual’s specific job functions, including cost, new business development, and profitmetrics.

Time-based equity awards were used in fiscal 2015 as a retention tool and to align our named executive officers’ interests with long-term stockholder value creation. In connection with our annual review of executive officer compensation, we awardedrestricted stock units to named executive officers in fiscal 2015 that began vesting in threefour equal annual installments, subject tocontinued service, starting March 1, 2016.2017.

Perquisites and Other Compensation. As in prior years, we did not provide any special perquisites to our named executiveofficers in fiscal 2015.2016. We provided certain perquisites and other health and welfare and retirement benefits, such as health, vision,and life insurance coverage and participation in and matching contributions under our 401(k) defined contribution plan, whichbenefits are generally available to all employees. For more information about these arrangements and benefits, see footnote four tothe “20152016 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Pension Benefits.None of our named executive officers participate in or have account balances in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.None of our named executive officers participate in or have account balances in non-qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans maintained by us.

Employment and Severance Arrangements

Change in Control Arrangements. We are party to employment agreements with certain of our executive officers,including our named executive officers, which provide severance benefits for employment terminations in connection with a changeof control. The change of control severance arrangements generally entitle each named executive officer to certain calculatedpayments tied to base salary and bonus targets and accelerated vesting of his outstanding equity awards, but only upon terminationby the us without cause or by the executive for good reason (as those terms are defined in the agreements) in connection with achange of control of the company (a “double trigger” arrangement). The Compensation Committee believes that these reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of our named executive officers to their assigned duties without the distractionarising from the possibility of a change of control, and to enable and encourage our named executive officers to focus their attention on obtaining the best possible outcome for our stockholders without being influenced by personal concerns regarding the possibleimpact of a change of control on their job security and benefits. For more information, see “Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” and “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Severance Arrangements. We also maintain our 2016 Management Career Transition Plan, adopted in August 2015,which generally entitles each named executive officer to certain calculated payments tied to salary and bonus targets, healthcare benefits, and outplacement assistance if the individual is terminated without cause. Under his employment agreement, our Chief Executive Officer also receives limited accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards if terminated without cause or if he resignsfor good reason.

The Compensation Committee believes that the 2016 Management Career Transition Plan provides benefits that are consistent with industry practice. We believe that entering into change of control and severance arrangements with certain ofour executives has helped us attract and retain excellent executive talent and that offering standard packages avoids case-by-case negotiations. Without these provisions, our named executive officers may not have chosen to accept employment with us or remainemployed by us. The severance arrangements also promote stability and continuity in our senior management team. For more information, please see “Executive Compensation―Employment Agreements,” “Executive Compensation—2016 Management Career Transition Plan” and “Executive Compensation―Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

Section 162(m) Considerations

Under Section 162(m) of the Code we are generally deniedlimits the deductions companies may take for compensation paid to our Chief ExecutiveOfficera chief executive officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer)the chief financial officer) to the extent thecompensation for any such individual exceeds $1 million for the taxable year, unless the compensation qualifies as “qualifiedperformance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. Our Compensation Committee may take action to preservetheconsiders deductibility of compensation payable to our executives, although deductibility will be onlyas one amongof a number of factorsconsidered in determining appropriate levels or methods of compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the taxdeduction limitation should not be permitted to compromise our ability to design and maintain executive compensation arrangementsthat will attract and retain the executive talentAccordingly, we need to compete successfully. Accordingly, achieving the desired flexibility inthe design and delivery of compensation may result inaward compensation that in certain cases is not deductible for federal incometax purposes.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2015, our Board adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives and Directors. Under these guidelines and subject to certain exceptions, our Chief Executive Officer is expected to own shares of our stock that have a value equal to five times his annual salary, with ownership measured at the end of each calendar year. Although Mr. Werner was required to satisfy the stockownership guidelines beginning five years after their implementation in 2015, he already owns shares with a value significantly inexcess of the guidelines. Other named executive officers are expected to own shares that have a value equal to their annual salary beginning five years after such officer first becomes subject to the guidelines. None of our executive officers other than Mr. Wernerare currently subject to the guidelines. Shares may be owned directly by the individual, or owned by the individual’s spouse, or held in trust for the benefit of the individual’s spouse family.

Other Disclosures

Under our insider trading policy, our executive officers, directors and employees are prohibited from engaging in shortsales of our securities, establishing margin accounts or otherwise pledging our securities, hedging our securities or buying or sellingoptions, puts or calls on our securities.

We do not have a policy regarding adjustment or recovery of awards or payments if the relevant performance goals or measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted so that awards or payments are reduced.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjustments Based on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

Our non-GAAP results include adjustments to recognize revenue and profit under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) that are consistent with the adjustments made in connection with our reporting process as part of our status as a consolidated subsidiary of Total S.A., a foreign public registrant which reports under IFRS. Differences between GAAP and IFRS reflected in our non-GAAP results are further described below. In these situations, we believe that IFRS enables us to better evaluate our revenue and profit generation performance, and assists in aligning the perspectives of our management and noncontrolling shareholders with those of Total S.A., our controlling shareholder.

Other Non-GAAP Adjustments

We use this non-GAAP financial measure to enable us to evaluate the Company’s performance, including compared with the performance of other companies.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation of Named Executive Officers

The 20152016 Summary Compensation Table below quantifies the compensation for each of our named executive officers for services rendered during fiscal 20152016 and, as applicable, fiscal 20142015 and fiscal 2013.2014. The primary elements of each named executive officer’s total compensation during fiscal 20152016 are reported in the table below and include, among others, base salary, performance-based cash bonuses under our 20152016 Annual Bonus Program and Semi-Annual Bonus Plan, awards of restricted stock units subject to time-based vesting, and awards of performance-based restricted stock units subject to achievement of financial targets and subsequent time-based vesting.

20152016 Summary Compensation Table